Coronavirus

[oldno7]

I'm hearing about items in this relief bill today.

Both d's and r's to blame.

this is not a relief bill, it turned into a loaded up pork sandwich topped with shit, not too palatable.

I'd veto it and give both sides one day to make it a clean aid bill.

politicians are scum.

If I was Trump

I'd go on tv in primetime tonight and read the pork, item by item and say this isn't the time, if there ever was to load up legislation with pork.

Bring me a clean relief bill--TOMORROW.

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

Study: COVID-19 Impacts Men, Women More Than All Other Genders Combined

BALTIMORE, MD—A new study by Johns Hopkins University found that the novel coronavirus is impacting men and women more than all the other genders combined.

According to the study, 100% of coronavirus cases have affected men and women and not a single other gender.

https://babylonbee.com/news/covid-19...nders-combined

[BasinCruiser]

Attachment 94353

[twotimer]

Welcome to 1984.

Attachment 94352

This is exactly why I'm booking outta here. Nobody tells me what to do.

[oldno7]

Those crazy PAC 12 guys

Stanford medical professors: COVID-19 death toll estimates may be 'orders of magnitude' too high

Stanford medical professors: COVID-19 death toll estimates may be 'orders of magnitude' too high


They believe the projections are 'deeply flawed'

"Fear of Covid-19 is based on its high estimated case fatality rate — 2% to 4% of people with confirmed Covid-19 have died, according to the World Health Organization and others," wrote Bendavid and Bhattacharya. "So if 100 million Americans ultimately get the disease, 2 million to 4 million could die. We believe that estimate is deeply flawed. The true fatality rate is the portion of those infected who die, not the deaths from identified positive cases."


How did they predict this?

The two professors argue that the best evidence of the coronavirus death rate being significantly lower than what is being reported may lie in the Italian town of Vò. On March 6, the town's 3,300 residents were tested. Of these, 90 tests came back positive, indicating a prevalence of 2.7% of the population having the virus.
If one were to apply this to the entire province where the town is located, which has a population of 955,000, it would mean there were actually 26,000 infections at the time, and not just the 198 that were officially confirmed. This would be 130 times greater than the number of reported cases. Since Italy's case fatality rate of 8% is estimated using the confirmed cases, Bendavid and Bhattacharya write, "the real fatality rate [of the virus] could in fact be closer to 0.06%."








https://www.theblaze.com/news/stanfo...too_high_death

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

And this really pisses me off--A raise??