Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 51

Thread: RBG

  1. #1
    Bogley BigShot oldno7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    We're all here, because we ain't all there.
    Posts
    11,209

    RBG

    I am 180* opposed to most of her viewpoints but would never wish the cruel demise to cancer on anyone.

    After having cancer come back in her lungs, it would seem her time is short.

    Today, surely by accident, FOX posted this.

    Do they know something we don't?
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    I'm not Spartacus


    Boycotting imlay canyon gear because I value access

    Professional Mangler of Grammar

    Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!

    Who Is John Galt?

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Bogley BigShot oldno7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    We're all here, because we ain't all there.
    Posts
    11,209
    of course, everyone knows this was Lincoln's attempt to appease democrats.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    I'm not Spartacus


    Boycotting imlay canyon gear because I value access

    Professional Mangler of Grammar

    Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!

    Who Is John Galt?

  4. #3
    Two things... the graphic was accidentally posted because Fox has it packed and ready to go...and if RBG goes while Trump is president the melt on the left will be epic.

    Trumps next SCOTUS pick would make the Kanvangh nomination look like a day in kindergarten.

  5. #4
    Bogley BigShot oldno7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    We're all here, because we ain't all there.
    Posts
    11,209
    Likely SCOTUS pick
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    I'm not Spartacus


    Boycotting imlay canyon gear because I value access

    Professional Mangler of Grammar

    Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!

    Who Is John Galt?

  6. #5
    Barrett would be a great pick. I also think Trump would have to pick a woman to try and drowned out the rape charges you just know some of the bat shit crazy women on the left that never met his SCOTUS pick would attempt to make stick.

    The Kanvangh conformation was a new low for the left.

  7. #6
    Yup...I want that crazy-eyed Christian chick, too. I wonder how they'll come after her...?
    Everything
    In it's right place

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by twotimer View Post
    Yup...I want that crazy-eyed Christian chick, too. I wonder how they'll come after her...?
    They will attack her with religion.... we know that as they have already begun the attacks.


  9. #8
    Well, I had that figured out already. The point is...if a Christian isn't "allowed", who is? Atheists only? Are they going to size up every guy she had sex with? See if she attended any parties?

    Y'know, they may hook Ginsburg up to a life support machine to prolong this to the max.
    Everything
    In it's right place

  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by twotimer View Post
    Y'know, they may hook Ginsburg up to a life support machine to prolong this to the max.
    Liberals desperately tried to get RBG to fall on her sword while they had control and could appoint another liberal but she refused.

    Constitutionalist's need to tip their hat to Kennedy for stepping aside when he did.

  11. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by twotimer View Post
    Well, I had that figured out already. The point is...if a Christian isn't "allowed", who is? Atheists only?
    They won't attack Christianity, just Catholicism. And no it doesn't make sense, but very little the radical left does makes sense or is defendable in an intelligent manner.

  12. #11
    I say he needs to nominate Marrick Garland. Actually a good guy and could be seen as voting either way on any given issue - good centrist. The left would go apeshit because the vowed to deny any Trump pic... but this was the guy they screamed bloody murder to get in. And I think it's a president's duty to keep the court as balanced as possible.

  13. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by double moo View Post
    I say he needs to nominate Marrick Garland. Actually a good guy and could be seen as voting either way on any given issue - good centrist.

    Not a chance in hell! Garland is anti 2nd Amendment and is not a constitutionalist.

    Garland has had four 2nd Amendment issues come before him in the lower courts and has voted anti gun every time.

    Garlands views are liberal, the only ones calling him a centralist would be liberals. The mainstream media attempted to paint him as a centrist when he was Obama's pick in the hope of shoving him through. Garland is cut from the same cloth as Breyer and Keagan, and would vote in lockstep with those two.

    The job of a judge is to interpret the law, not make the law.



    Climb-Utah.com

  14. Likes LOAH, dougrz liked this post
  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by twotimer View Post
    Well, I had that figured out already. The point is...if a Christian isn't "allowed", who is? Atheists only? Are they going to size up every guy she had sex with? See if she attended any parties?

    Y'know, they may hook Ginsburg up to a life support machine to prolong this to the max.
    It would only be fair, since Christians have had every other supreme court pick in history, to get one atheist on board.

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by uintafly View Post
    It would only be fair, since Christians have had every other supreme court pick in history, to get one atheist on board.
    Y' know, that wouldn't bother me at all. Personally, I never bought into the mansion and streets paved with gold stuff anyway. However, I find most Christians to be honest and trustworthy.

    No one should be appointed because it's "time for one of these". I like the crazy eyed Christian chick (Barrett) because I've been thinking more favorably towards Pro Life as of late.
    Everything
    In it's right place

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by twotimer View Post
    Y' know, that wouldn't bother me at all. Personally, I never bought into the mansion and streets paved with gold stuff anyway. However, I find most Christians to be honest and trustworthy.

    No one should be appointed because it's "time for one of these". I like the crazy eyed Christian chick (Barrett) because I've been thinking more favorably towards Pro Life as of late.
    Oh not me. The more people I meet the more I fall on the pro choice of things,

  18. #16
    Bogley BigShot oldno7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    We're all here, because we ain't all there.
    Posts
    11,209
    Quote Originally Posted by uintafly View Post
    Oh not me. The more people I meet the more I fall on the pro choice of things,
    you need to get outside of democrat circles to solve this dilemma.
    I'm not Spartacus


    Boycotting imlay canyon gear because I value access

    Professional Mangler of Grammar

    Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!

    Who Is John Galt?

  19. Likes LOAH liked this post
  20. #17
    Bogley BigShot oldno7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    We're all here, because we ain't all there.
    Posts
    11,209
    ....
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    I'm not Spartacus


    Boycotting imlay canyon gear because I value access

    Professional Mangler of Grammar

    Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!

    Who Is John Galt?

  21. Likes rockgremlin liked this post
  22. #18

  23. Likes devo_stevo, Iceaxe liked this post
  24. #19

  25. Likes LOAH, rockgremlin liked this post
  26. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by BasinCruiser View Post
    Name:  AB0B98B6-E86F-492D-B070-99C1921B4543.jpg
Views: 101
Size:  21.6 KB

    What do you think it's gonna be? What is the narrative going to be that the left will try and use to torpedo this?

    Will it be:

    A. Porn star
    B. Embezzler of funds from a previous employer
    C. Adulteress
    D. Teenage shoplifter
    E. Didn't return library book in 1981
    F. Vehicular hit and run incident
    G. DUI
    H. History of drug abuse
    I. Prescription Fraud
    J. Tax evader
    K. Cheated on exams in college
    L. Made racially charged comment in 1993
    M. Ignored homeless man at supermarket twice in 2001
    N. Supposed ties to KKK
    O. Gambling debts
    P. Unpaid parking tickets
    Q. Smoked marijuana in high school
    R. Spread gossip about some girl in 4th grade
    S. Relatives have mafia ties
    T. Lied about academic background
    U. Great grandfather owned slaves
    V. Visited Russia once over a decade ago
    W. Public Intoxication
    X. Uses plastic drinking straws
    Y. Combo plate - 2 or more of any of the above

    and possibly the worst of all...

    Z. Stood next to a Native American
    Epstein did not kill himself...



Visitors found this page by searching for:

Outdoor Forum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •