Results 4,281 to 4,300 of 4905
Thread: 2020
-
12-03-2020, 03:23 PM #4281I'm not Spartacus
It'll come back.
Professional Mangler of Grammar
Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!
Who Is John Galt?
-
12-03-2020 03:23 PM # ADS
-
12-03-2020, 03:27 PM #4282I'm not Spartacus
It'll come back.
Professional Mangler of Grammar
Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!
Who Is John Galt?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 LikesSombeech, rockgremlin liked this post
-
12-03-2020, 03:30 PM #4283
"I know it's not good for me but I'm having mine with butter"
I'm not Spartacus
It'll come back.
Professional Mangler of Grammar
Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!
Who Is John Galt?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
12-03-2020, 03:33 PM #4284I'm not Spartacus
It'll come back.
Professional Mangler of Grammar
Guns don't kill people--Static Ropes Do!!
Who Is John Galt?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 LikesByron liked this post
-
12-03-2020, 03:53 PM #4285
..
-
12-03-2020, 04:21 PM #4286
Ahh, The Epoch Times -- about the only objective news reporting agency left in the world. You know damn well MSNBC and/or CNN aren't gonna even dream of reporting this information. They're still too fixated on Giuliani's hair dye.
IMO, this "Smoking Gun" is definitely compelling -- but it isn't going to change anything. At this point everybody has pretty much quietly agreed that Biden won...he likely cheated...but he still won. The fakenews media will brush this aside as another desperate attempt by the Trump legal team to change the inevitable end result.
And I think the DNC knows damn well that cheating happened, but at this point they're defying anybody to prove it beyond a few affidavits.It's only "science" if it supports the narrative.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
-
12-03-2020, 04:28 PM #4287
^^^This^^^
-
12-03-2020, 04:36 PM #4288
I think this is in the hands of Tucker and Hannity, followed by Brit Hume, now. Yes, Fox.
This video is that powerful, and is the opening.
It takes one legislature to stand up. But the mere men in those shoes will have to risk their professional and political lives to act. Cover from Fox will make that possible.
Sad that action requires cover from the media. But it does. Truth itself is no longer sufficient.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likesoldno7 liked this post
-
12-03-2020, 04:56 PM #4289
The GA video is gaining traction.
Dershowitz commented on it tonight, saying it's compelling. Hannity tweeted about it and will hopefully headline it tonight. This isn't about proving in court, but getting state legs to act.
Hannity < Tucker < Brit, in terms of cover.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likesoldno7 liked this post
-
12-03-2020, 05:34 PM #4290
I'd feel a lot better if Trump would get a win in one of the important swing states to start the pendulum swinging in his direction...
GOP asks SCOTUS to block PA vote certification.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop...pa-votes-count
-
12-03-2020, 05:34 PM #4291
Tucker is covering on the next segment.
This is it. Last shot, imo. This video can't be clearer. Tied to a spike in time. Tied to observers being kicked out. Clear pulling of secret cases of ballots. Affidavits filed before the video confirmed.
Nothing more can be shown.
Momentum has to start tonight.
-
12-03-2020, 05:35 PM #4292
-
12-03-2020, 06:20 PM #4293
Legally, I think the NV case is strongest with the best data, and a judge who gave favorable rulings along the way.
34k margin. Eclipsed by ~90k flat out illegal votes. These aren't even signature disputes. They're just flat illegal votes.
-
12-03-2020, 06:45 PM #4294
So apparently these people are all full of shit...confused liars one and all?
The end of the world for some...
The foundation of paradise for others.
-
12-03-2020, 07:20 PM #4295
More on this. PA is the clearest Constitutional case. Where the Const says a legislature can set the manner of selecting electors. Which means a governor can't order it and a court can't order it.
But I could also see the SC saying, "People voted in good faith, following what was at the time the lawful voting method. Therefore striking down such votes is an unfair punishment to them, with neither fault nor deception by the voter himself."
Where NV is obvious illegal votes. WI is obvious illegally registered people (case centers on people who registered solely on their ballot envelope). GA is videod machine stuffing. Etc.
MI and AZ don't have the clear legal cases as the others do, imo.
-
12-03-2020, 08:38 PM #4296
Sun Tzu's Art of War is the basis behind Trump's philosophy in the Art of the Deal... So Trump is very intimate with Sun Tzu's strategies....And that's what he's doing here.....
One of the core tenets in the Art of War is feigning weakness when you are strong, and strength where you are weak.... The classic Poker bluff essentially, and Trump is the master of the Poker bluff.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 LikesSombeech liked this post
-
12-03-2020, 08:56 PM #4297
I'm mobile so I don't want to type a bunch of crap out, but for those of you thinking we know there's fraud but can't do anything about it you sirs are incorrect.
Kemp (Georgia) just finally agreed to a signature audit.
Things are moving forward exactly as planned. It's not the big flashing evidence event because those can be distracted with a mass shooting or elderly man driving a bus through the market crowd.
You are seeing the steady drip, drip, drip of evidence. How to boil a frog.
Big flashy moves too early in the game give the enemy time for a rebuttal. But the steady drip of evidence is indefensible.
Plenty of time still, all going to plan. Trump wins 2020. Just like they set out to do, and are following every step. This has been planned for years, exactly this.
Wait till you see how crazy the Dems get when they call for his removal from the Whitehouse.
And there, I ended up typing a bunch of crap anyways
-
12-06-2020, 03:23 AM #4298
Looks like a bunch of posts were lost?
The Dec 8 and 14 deadlines for legal disputes are obviously a death problem for that avenue. I've thought those aren't Constitutional, since the only date in the Const is Jan 20.
There is a legal opinion out agreeing with that. Alito set a deadline for PA to respond to his request of Dec. 9. Why did he do that? To kill the suit, or prove a point that Dec 8 isn't going to stand?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likesoldno7 liked this post
-
12-06-2020, 08:36 AM #4299
..
-
12-06-2020, 12:18 PM #4300
..
Similar Threads
-
Doctor Visit - 2020 AD
By CrazyFinn in forum The Political ArenaReplies: 0Last Post: 07-10-2009, 08:47 PM
Visitors found this page by searching for:
Outdoor Forum