Supreme Court Justice

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[oldno7]

[rockgremlin]

^^^ "Civil War" -- Ha! That's a laugh. They've been waging uncivil war in the streets of our cities for months, and now they want to talk about a "civil" war?


I say bring it on. A civil war would be a welcome change to the nonsense that has been going on in every big city in America since March.


Do they even know how to fight a war on civil terms?

[BasinCruiser]

So, who else here was was assaulted by Barrett 30 years ago? Just trying to get a feel for the list of people to line up for the dems to testify at the upcoming hearing.

Speaking of lynching, I'm old enough to remember that not more than 3 months ago, the Dems were all against it. Are they going to flip that stance....again? Is this one of those instances of the famous party 'flips'?

[Iceaxe]

Trump already erased Obama's legacy... if he erases RBG's I'm good with that.

[BasinCruiser]

Food for thought.... Why it’s imperative a new SCJ is appointed.

[dougrz]

New states and ending the filibuster. These have been the Dems' 2021 goals all along. Add now packing the court. This confirmation fight explodes that truth into the light.

One of my reasons for pessimism with all you peeps here is the hidden agenda wasn't being discussed in the mass media. And like it or not, the mass media still reaches and influences more than not.

But the hidden agenda will no longer be hidden. It will be more and more openly discussed. That can only help us.

[rockgremlin]

But the hidden agenda will no longer be hidden. It will be more and more openly discussed. That can only help us.

YES!!


If the Dems can bend and break the rules to fit their agenda, they have to know that the Republicans will assert equal right to do the same. Turnabout is fair play.

Trump could load up the Supreme Court with 4 more conservative justices that would guarantee a Republican filibuster for at least a generation. (Although honestly I doubt he would do that).

[Iceaxe]

My money is currently on Barbara Lagoa to be Trumps SCOTUS nominee.

In addition to being extremely qualified and a strong conservative, Lagoa is a Floridian whose parents fled Cuba. President Trump must win Florida on November 3rd. To win Florida, he needs the Latino vote there. Choosing Lagoa to fill the vacant seat is a strategic choice going into this election.

What do you think?

Barbara Lagoa
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/who...ourt-contender

[oldno7]

hooo---wheee, these aged well

https://twitter.com/ITGuy1959/status...77608487628802

[rockgremlin]

hooo---wheee, these aged well

https://twitter.com/ITGuy1959/status...77608487628802

"It's the Supreme Court, not the Make-a-Wish Foundation".

[Iceaxe]

Lindsey Graham is on Hannity and says he has the votes needed.

[rockgremlin]

I believe this Democrat tissy-fit about SCOTUS is only going to blow up in their faces. The average American who pays even a little attention to politics can see that the Democrats are trying to subvert the system in a failed attempt to regain power. And the fact that they refuse to accept that Trump is following the rules that they themselves established in 2016 does not look good. It makes them look weak and desperate, and it's a huge turn off to anyone claiming to belong to their party.

It would bode better for them to accept the newest member of SCOTUS with grace and dignity instead of vowing "Civil War" in a blind rage. Geez they act like such crybabies all the time.

[Byron]

My money is currently on Barbara Lagoa to be Trumps SCOTUS nominee.

In addition to being extremely qualified and a strong conservative, Lagoa is a Floridian whose parents fled Cuba. President Trump must win Florida on November 3rd. To win Florida, he needs the Latino vote there. Choosing Lagoa to fill the vacant seat is a strategic choice going into this election.

What do you think?

Barbara Lagoa
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/who...ourt-contender

She was a mystery woman to me until I saw a profile on her this morning...I'm with you, I think this would be the best choice.

[Iceaxe]

I believe this Democrat tissy-fit about SCOTUS is only going to blow up in their faces. The average American who pays even a little attention to politics can see that the Democrats are trying to subvert the system in a failed attempt to regain power. And the fact that they refuse to accept that Trump is following the rules that they themselves established in 2016 does not look good. It makes them look weak and desperate, and it's a huge turn off to anyone claiming to belong to their party.

It would bode better for them to accept the newest member of SCOTUS with grace and dignity instead of vowing "Civil War" in a blind rage. Geez they act like such crybabies all the time.

One minor correction... Trump is not following the rules the Democrats set in 2016.... Trump is following the Constitution of the United States that was signed by our founding fathers in 1787.

[rockgremlin]

One minor correction... Trump is not following the rules the Democrats set in 2016.... Trump is following the Constitution of the United States that was signed by our founding fathers in 1787.

Clearly.

But what I was referring to was the majority rule that Harry Reid helped to install back in 2013. I misspoke when I said 2016. My bad.