Women's March

[twotimer]

They complain about how crass and vulgar he is, and then turn right around and do the very thing they're complaining about.

Holy Moses no kidding! Doesn't this remind you of awkward kids back in the 8th grade? Sloppy as hell.

I've looked at a few slide shows of this thing today...there's a lot of cats on these signs. I think they look at Trump, his wife and daughter and see a very patriarchal family, and they don't like it at all. I would guess that most of these women had their fathers feel them up at one time or another or at least had some dude that wouldn't take "NO" for an answer. If a little light was shining above the heads of every gal there that this applies to, I think you'd be seeing lights everywhere you look. They seem to have a real hard time getting over stuff like that.

Predatory sexual behavior by males has been going on forever...good luck putting an end to it. Which reminds me...I have a cartoon on my fridge that I cut from a Playboy many years ago...

In the background, there's a caveman with a club over his shoulder and he's dragging a female by her hair. In the foreground, there's another caveman boinking a woman with a smile on her face. He says "Guess what, Zog, you don't have to bop them first"!

CNN and MSNBC in particular, are completely out of their minds with this. They're moving towards no even referring to Trump as the President. Just a bit ago, a CNN reporter, doing her segment in front of the White House, said "The people who occupy this house won't even acknowledge that the march happened today". But it doesn't matter what they say and how long they keep this up...they're sloppy and stupid just like that idiot they backed for President. They're making a lot of noise, but when the rubber hits the road, hardly enough care. I think they know that, and that makes them even madder.

All these gals and their "organizers" don't have what it takes to start any kind of meaningful "revolution"...to what end, by the way? Even if they were to get rid of Trump, they'd end up with Pence. Certainly that wouldn't be satisfactory. Freakout on parade, man.

I was born in '63, so I was too young to remember the hippie/anti-war/ERA protests, but it looks like they're trying to force a rebirth? I personally don't see any real meat to chew on with this one. I'm hopeful things will settle down.

[Scott P]

Then don't ask me to pay for it.

While I agree with this in principle, and I have never used federally funded birth control (and have never been on any kind of welfare), wouldn't it actually save taxpayer money, rather than cost taxpayer money? I am a father myself (and a good one!) and am pretty sure that birth control is cheaper than kids. If people can't afford birth control, I'm pretty sure that they can't afford kids either. Giving them access to birth control will probably save a whole lot of money. There are already too many kids born to people who can't afford them.

[twotimer]

There are already too many kids born to people who can't afford them.

Yeah...subsidizing meat for brains. You may be right, Scott...we may have no choice because it appears to be so common.

[twotimer]

It's an art festival, man!

[twotimer]

[Scott P]

That's just nasty. I don't know if I should laugh or be horrified.

They complain about how crass and vulgar he is, and then turn right around and do the very thing they're complaining about.

I think the issue isn't just about being vulgar, it is because of the comments describing sexual assault. If it were just a few crass words or F-Bombs, no one would care. I know some just pass it off as no big deal, but I can see why women would be upset. Personally, I wouldn't want anyone talking to my wife or daughter like that.



I think a lot of people would be more forgiving if Trump shows that he is a changed man, but he hasn't really shown this or shown any remorse.

[rockgremlin]

That's just nasty. I don't know if I should laugh or be horrified.



I think the issue isn't just about being vulgar, it is because of the comments describing sexual assault. If it were just a few crass words or F-Bombs, no one would care. I know some just pass it off as no big deal, but I can see why women would be upset. Personally, I wouldn't want anyone talking to my wife or daughter like that.


I think a lot of people would be more forgiving if Trump shows that he is a changed man, but he hasn't really shown this or shown any remorse.

So their idea of fighting against sexual harassment is to draw a picture of a vagina with an eyeball staring at you and parade that up and down the street? Are you being serious right now?

I understand they're angry, but I don't think they're doing anything to champion their cause by parading all over hell with pictures of pussies. If anything it makes them look incredibly foolish.

If I took one look at those posters and didn't know better I would've thought they were protesting against pornography....or for more pornography, who knows?

[rockgremlin]

Go home, you're drunk.

[Sombeech]

I think a lot of people would be more forgiving if Trump shows that he is a changed man, but he hasn't really shown this or shown any remorse.

Since those are things he said when he wasn't a politician, I'm curious what people would accept as a sign that he has changed.

For most, if you used to say certain things, and now you don't, that's the most basic definition of change.

In all honesty, for those referencing disgusting language, and the types of things I want to shield my children from, scroll up in this thread.

[twotimer]

Personally, I want to apologize to anyone that comes to this thread and is offended by the pictures I posted. I mean that sincerely with cinnamon, sugar and little love sprinkles on top.

It is interesting to me that the "kitty cat" signs were common in different cities...and that so many of these people carried a lack of consideration for the children that were dragged to these things.

Trumps comments don't bother me one bit. It was recorded without his knowledge and it's indeed "locker room" talk. Heck, if some of the women I work for were aware of what goes through my head or the sexually crass things I've actually said, they wouldn't want me in their house.

He did apologize for this, BTW...and I bet his wife and daughter read him the riot act.

[uintafly]

Then don't ask me to pay for it.

The problem is we are part of a society and we pay for a lot of stuff we don't like. I was against the Iraq war but I paid for it. I'm against people having a million kids but I pay for their schools.

[Iceaxe]

The problem is we are part of a society and we pay for a lot of stuff we don't like. I was against the Iraq war but I paid for it. I'm against people having a million kids but I pay for their schools.

^^^THIS^^^

[Iceaxe]

[oldno7]

Trump signed another executive order.
He turned the obama phones off.

You can now sign up for a free TRUMP alarm clock.

[rockgremlin]

When all else fails, resort to porn. Way to keep it classy, ladies.

[Iceaxe]

[oldno7]

[rockgremlin]

Brutal!

Kinda puts things in perspective doesn't it?

[Scott P]

When all else fails, resort to porn. Way to keep it classy, ladies.

I dare you to wear this for your next Halloween costume.

[tallsteve]

While I agree with this in principle, and I have never used federally funded birth control (and have never been on any kind of welfare), wouldn't it actually save taxpayer money, rather than cost taxpayer money? I am a father myself (and a good one!) and am pretty sure that birth control is cheaper than kids. If people can't afford birth control, I'm pretty sure that they can't afford kids either. Giving them access to birth control will probably save a whole lot of money. There are already too many kids born to people who can't afford them.

I guess what I should have said was: don't tell me your reproductive rights are none of my business and THEN ask me to pay for it. If I'm paying taxes for it, then it is my business.