Bogley Software Update

[Sombeech]

i got a question for you, 'beech. i think it relates to this. i just posted a tiny .png image (POST) and it massively expanded the photo. is this the correct behavior or am i doing something wrong? i didn't expect a small low-resolution image to be resized.

hmmm... It must be stretching everything UP to 800 wide, everything uploaded through the "attachment" method anyways rather than "insert image", let me fix that.

By the way, still working on that window for attachments, it's butt ugly.

[stefan]

hmmm... It must be stretching everything UP to 800 wide, everything uploaded through the "attachment" method anyways rather than "insert image", let me fix that.

thanks!

[Sombeech]

I did have photo's load in reverse order on my "I fell into" thread.

OK check it out... Using the Insert Image method, all of your photos will upload and display on bogley in the order that they appear in the "browse" window. So if your photos are sorted by name, date modified, type, or whatever.... that's the order they'll upload and appear on bogley now. Here's a demonstration with 10 simple photos, each one named with the number it displays...

I'll insert and upload first while they're sorted in descending order by name, as seen by this screenshot of my browse window:



And since I selected all 10, here's the order in which they uploaded:





















Now I'll sort within my browse window by name, descending.



And now they'll be in descending order:





















So this will be relevant if you've touched up certain photos out of chronological order, and within your browse window they're sorted by date modified. Just quickly sort by name and they'll upload in the order you probably meant

So after this, I'm seeing no real reason to use the "Attachment / Asset Manager" method (the paperclip) because the Insert Image is so much easier with batch uploading. We may even consider ditching that paperclip icon because it's being problematic right now anyways. Objections?

[accadacca]

Works for me. Nice work!

[oldno7]

amazing work guys, thx

[stefan]

i just thought i'd ask about this because it's a new behavior (forgive me if someone has already posted about this).

when an ad is placed in a post, it shrinks the horizontal space that the post can take up since the ad is placed to the side. if the browser window is not stretched wide, it can cause massive narrowing of the post. i'm including an example below which has the browser window extended fairly wide. if the browser is narrowed to how i like it, the post is about 1 inch wide making it very difficult to read.

[stefan]

also, not sure if this is a problem on my end or not, but on tapatalk, the basement shows no topics when viewing it through the Forum tab.

[Sombeech]

i just thought i'd ask about this because it's a new behavior (forgive me if someone has already posted about this).

when an ad is placed in a post, it shrinks the horizontal space that the post can take up since the ad is placed to the side. if the browser window is not stretched wide, it can cause massive narrowing of the post. i'm including an example below which has the browser window extended fairly wide. if the browser is narrowed to how i like it, the post is about 1 inch wide making it very difficult to read.

oops, those ads in the first post are only available to guests / users not logged in. We'll whack that ad I'm assuming you took that screenshot as a guest because I don't see the "Edit Post" button next to "Reply with Quote"?

We'll get rid of that ad though, not a pretty site.

[stefan]

oops, those ads in the first post are only available to guests / users not logged in. We'll whack that ad I'm assuming you took that screenshot as a guest because I don't see the "Edit Post" button next to "Reply with Quote"?

We'll get rid of that ad though, not a pretty site.

ahh i see. yeah sometimes i'm logged in sometimes out (don't always pay attention to it).

if the ads are necessary/helpful to the site, they could go above or below the post if they avoid constraining it.

thanks for the quick reply!

[Scott P]

Not a complaint, but are we not allowed to cut and paste photos anymore? I used to be able to cross post trip reports quicky, but it seems like it doesn't work anymore. It takes much longer to cut and past a trip report now.

[keithd]

I got a little confused in the posts about Marking Forums Read about whether it was fixed or not...am I doing something wrong, because it's not working for me?

[neilether]

I got a little confused in the posts about Marking Forums Read about whether it was fixed or not...am I doing something wrong, because it's not working for me?

Same here.

[Sombeech]

Not a complaint, but are we not allowed to cut and paste photos anymore? I used to be able to cross post trip reports quicky, but it seems like it doesn't work anymore. It takes much longer to cut and past a trip report now.

Just a quick test from utahmountainbiking... looks like it's working on my end, are you still having this problem? What browser are you using? Can you give me an example link that won't work to copy and paste from?


************************************************** ****

Here are two that I took from corner canyon! Attachments: File comment: Clark's in the fall Clark's in the fall.jpg [ 167.14 KiB | Viewed 381 times ] File comment: Ghost Falls in the fall Ghost Falls in the Fall.jpg [ 167.65 KiB | Viewed 381 times ] _________________ I'm new to clips..."effing clips" said my elbows!
Top

Gage	Post subject: Re: Photo Contest ($200 map set as prize) for Trail Map Cove Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 1:47 pm
AF Canyon...Love those trails. Attachments: File comment: Only Because it was today 5.19.12 Various Rides 012 2.jpg [ 164.92 KiB | Viewed 356 times ] File comment: Ants knoll ants knoll.jpg [ 514.56 KiB | Viewed 356 times ] _________________ Our Trail adventures - http://onetrailatatime.blogspot.com/ and http://adventuresutah.blogspot.com/

[Sombeech]

Mark Forums Read is finally fixed, sorry it took so long. (from the top navigation bar)

Another little issue I'm working on is when there are multiple pages to a thread, your current page isn't highlighted....

[keithd]

Thanks!

[reverse_dyno]

The Quick Reply box where you type in text doesn

[Scott P]

Just a quick test from utahmountainbiking... looks like it's working on my end, are you still having this problem? What browser are you using? Can you give me an example link that won't work to copy and paste from?

Still no luck. I'm using Internet Explorer.

Example link:

http://www.summitpost.org/a-return-t...-report/792541

Here's what I get from cut and paste:

May 12 2012

Kimberly, Shaylee, Kessler and I decided to make a quick canyoneering trip to South Fork Buckwater Draw. We chose this canyon because it can be done on a day trip from our house.

We made our way to the canyon before dropping down the steep slope and into the canyon. The action started immediately and we had a lot of fun with all the down climbs and the two rappels. The kids did great on the downclimbs and their skills have increased much in the last year. After enjoying the canyon it was time to pay the piper and we had to climb out of the canyon. We were tired by the time we reached the vehicle again.

The photos will tell the story.

Downclimbing on of the minor obstacles.

Shaylee on the first rap in South Fork Buckwater.

One of the challenging downclimbs along the route.

One of the many boulders in the canyon.

Shaylee having fun in South Fork Buckwater Draw.

Kimberly downclimbing an obstacle in South Fork Buckwater Draw.

Shaylee and Kessler in the slot.

Having fun in the South Fork Buckwater Draw.

One of the tricky downclimbs.

Kimberly on a downclimb.

Shaylee on the last dryfall.

This is the lower end of Buckwater Draw.

Shaylee holding a giant moth in Buckwater Draw.

The lower and very deep end of Buckwater Draw.

This is the lower end of Buckwater Draw.

Some of the pretty sandstone bluffs as seen from the exit of Buckwater Draw.

Climbing out part of the steep exit in Buckwater Draw.

[Sombeech]

Dang, sorry Scott, it's working fine for me I'm using Firefox though, let me try IE

May 12 2012

Kimberly, Shaylee, Kessler and I decided to make a quick canyoneering trip to South Fork Buckwater Draw. We chose this canyon because it can be done on a day trip from our house.

We made our way to the canyon before dropping down the steep slope and into the canyon. The action started immediately and we had a lot of fun with all the down climbs and the two rappels. The kids did great on the downclimbs and their skills have increased much in the last year. After enjoying the canyon it was time to pay the piper and we had to climb out of the canyon. We were tired by the time we reached the vehicle again.

The photos will tell the story.

Downclimbing on of the minor obstacles.

Shaylee on the first rap in South Fork Buckwater.

One of the challenging downclimbs along the route.

[Sombeech]

OK here I'm trying both copying and pasting in Internet Explorer from your link.

EDIT, OK I see the symptoms in IE9.... strange. OK, let me look into this.

May 12 2012

Kimberly, Shaylee, Kessler and I decided to make a quick
canyoneering trip to South Fork Buckwater Draw. We chose this canyon because it
can be done on a day trip from our house.

We made our way to the canyon
before dropping down the steep slope and into the canyon. The action started
immediately and we had a lot of fun with all the down climbs and the two
rappels. The kids did great on the downclimbs and their skills have increased
much in the last year. After enjoying the canyon it was time to pay the piper
and we had to climb out of the canyon. We were tired by the time we reached the
vehicle again.

The photos will tell the story.

Downclimbing on of the minor obstacles.

Shaylee on the first rap in South Fork Buckwater.

One of the challenging downclimbs along the route.

[Sombeech]

OK, for some reason when copying from Internet Explorer, when the tables are pasted it removes the summitpost.org url and replaces it with bogley.com, but it doesn't do that with Firefox. Strange because I've got no modification to do that, it must be the way it tries to store the images locally. Let me continue to look into this, but just to confirm that the problem does not exist in Firefox.