Results 21 to 25 of 25
-
09-12-2011, 07:56 AM #21
Al-Q blatantly took credit for the attack, and 10 years later is still claiming it even through the sheer hell we've reigned on them. They're pretty committed to it still.
I'm speaking without a ton of knowledge on it also, but where were the other cameras? Do we know there is other footage?How can you debunk the Pentagon with 5 frames of film? Why not release the rest of the video footage? Why did it take years of law suits to just get those 5 frames?
Plus, there were HUNDREDS of witnesses driving down the highway as they saw the low flying passenger jet flying overhead. To dismiss their witness and statements because of what 5 frames of grainy video shows is probably a less logical way to go.
-
09-12-2011 07:56 AM # ADS
-
09-12-2011, 10:28 AM #22
I never said Al -Qaeda did not attack the US. What I am saying is that the investigation was not handled properly, and there are a lot of questions that were not answered and information suppressed post 9/11.
Remember, Al-Qaeda was a CIA operation during the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. We started the fire with this group, just sayin............
There were hundreds of cameras on the Pentagon. And all of the footage was classified minus 5 frames from one camera which everyone has seen. Why? We all saw the planes fly into the towers, why can we not see the Pentagon footage? If you are going to seek the truth you have to be willing to ask all the questions, not just settle for a half-ass response from a bunch of politicians.
IMHO there are a lot of unanswered questions. I think the American people deserve to know the truth about this day since it robbed us all of a lot of civil liberties and has cost the lives of thousands of American troops since.
-
09-12-2011, 10:49 AM #23
True, I'm not making excuses for them either, but the footage we're all familiar with of the Towers isn't from Government agent cameras.
What would be gained if we saw an HD clip of the Pentagon attack? Would that be to remove doubt that it wasn't the passenger jet? And if THAT wouldn't stop the accusations, maybe they don't see a motivation to publish it - if the conspiracies would remain, which they would. Seriously, what would the gov't gain by publishing a slo-mo high def version? True it would make a lot of us fell better, but maybe they don't see that as their responsibility.
I'm just not sure why people feel it wasn't the passenger airline when so many witnesses saw it.
This is a 9/11 conspiracy thread now.
-
09-12-2011, 12:40 PM #24four-oh-four
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Just a few miles from Zion National Park
- Posts
- 8,301
- Threads
- 329
Dentist in St. George...
Baby Number 5 was 1 year old and had 3 more very young girls at home.By Bo Beck and Tanya Milligan:
Favorite Hikes in and around Zion National Park
To get it signed, get it from the link above.
If you like the book, please give us a kind review on Amazon
and REI and anywhere else this book is sold.
Zion National Park on the web.
-
09-12-2011, 12:54 PM #25
A conspiracy theory explains an event as being the result of an alleged plot by a covert group or organization or, more broadly, the idea that important political, social or economic events are the products of secret plots that are largely unknown to the general public.
I am not saying there were any plots, agendas or organizations implicated. There is just not enough evidence to show that at this time. What I am saying is this investigation was not handled by the letter of the law and the actions of our government in all branches were suspicious to say the least. I say if you are going to release information then release the truth. If they have nothing to hide, why not let the truth come out?
When me and you and millions of other Americans were not allowed to fly post 9/11, why was the family of a man (Bin Laden) who was implicated as the master mind of 9/11 allowed to fly out of the United States without any interviews which could have lead to his capture under federal law? If I blew up a building I am sure my family members would not be allowed to leave until they were at least interrogated. 5 FBI and former FBI agents testified under oath that the Bin Ladens were not investigated and allowed by executive order to leave the country. Again, why?
You see, none of any of this makes sense. There is so much more, but I would not like to be marked as a extremist since that is not the point for me. I see poor investigative procedure by Federal Law enforcement and our top branches of government. This incompetence portrayed is outrageous to say the least. And tax payers should be pissed, when a job under law is not done correctly. Imagine the intel we lost by not following through. Especially about an event as huge as 9/11. Food for thought.
Similar Threads
-
Pearl Harbor 69 years ago today
By stefan in forum General DiscussionReplies: 7Last Post: 12-13-2010, 05:37 PM -
Star Trek turned 44 years old today
By Iceaxe in forum General DiscussionReplies: 12Last Post: 09-10-2010, 08:20 PM -
YouTube's First Video Uploaded 5 Years Ago Today
By Sombeech in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 04-23-2010, 10:45 AM -
20 years ago today...
By Iceaxe in forum General DiscussionReplies: 6Last Post: 03-30-2010, 02:19 PM -
145 Years Ago Today
By Iceaxe in forum General DiscussionReplies: 9Last Post: 07-02-2008, 01:11 PM



Reply With Quote

Anyone can please tell me...
Today, 01:01 PM in General Discussion