Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: Descender Overheating?

  1. #1

    Descender Overheating?

    Granted - I had this question while doing the last rap out of Heaps in the pitch black while exhausted, so please forgive me if it's ridiculous. Is there a danger from the descender overheating and causing damage to the rope? I alternated between going faster so my Totem wouldn't stay in the same place for too long and pausing to let it cool down. If there is a danger what's the best way to mitigate it?
    You May All Go To Hell And I Will Go To Texas

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Yeah- there is a danger. The best way to mitigate it is to get it off your rope as soon as you're down. The heat won't start to melt unless it's stopped on one place. Typically this happens when you're at the end of the rap and back on solid footing.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by xxnitsuaxx View Post
    Is there a danger from the descender overheating and causing damage to the rope?
    Probably depends on the type of rope, too. I foolishly used a polypro rope once and glazed almost the whole thing with a hot ATC. Scary low melting point.

    Kevlar? Not so much. More of a concern of damage to the rap device perhaps.

    Besides going slow, I think I've heard of folks using water to cool down a hot rap device. Also, soaking the ropes in water prior to a long drop might work too.

    I'd be curious to hear what other folks would offer up, though...

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by xxnitsuaxx View Post
    Granted - I had this question while doing the last rap out of Heaps in the pitch black while exhausted, so please forgive me if it's ridiculous. Is there a danger from the descender overheating and causing damage to the rope? I alternated between going faster so my Totem wouldn't stay in the same place for too long and pausing to let it cool down. If there is a danger what's the best way to mitigate it?
    Stopping to let it cool down means that the rope is absorbing some of that heat all in one place.. I am sure I am an oddball but I don't like having my rope glazed all to heck and being a caver I have a rack so that is what i use.. much much less risk of overheating and much easier to change friction as you go :)
    Tacoma Said - If Scott he asks you to go on a hike, ask careful questions like "Is it going to be on a trail?" "What are the chances it will kill me?" etc. Maybe "Will there be sack-biting ants along the way?"

  6. #5
    Content Provider Emeritus ratagonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Quiet and charming: Mount Carmel
    Posts
    7,158
    It gets discussed now and again. There are stories of sport rappellers burning through a rope but only on really long raps, and only when deliberately going REAL fast. Google fails to find anything for me right away.

    Worry about it? A little.

    Polyester softens at around 240 deg C (464 deg F). Yes, when we run down the rope fast and hit a wet spot in the rope, it hisses - indicating the device is warmer than 100 deg C (212 F). But, it is a LONG way from there to 240 deg C.

    There are numerous mechanisms that would tend to prevent your rappel device from heating up too far. As it gets warmer, it transfers heat to the rope, which then disperses it. Unless you stop, in which case that energy goes into one spot. Much of the heat transfer of a warm Pirana is via radiation, which goes up as the 5th power of the temperature difference, so as the Pirana gets hotter, it radiates A LOT more energy.

    It certainly seems possible to singe the fuzzy fibers on the outside of a rope, though that I have usually seen from it running across a piece of textile that heats up and gives up melt to the rope (such as, if the rope was running across a sling or a pack). Having done that last rap in Heaps a dozen times or more, I have NEVER noticed a singed or melted part or segment on the rope afterward. Yes, the rope has hissed, a lot! Yes, the device is way too hot to touch. But damage an actual, real, polyester or nylon rope - seems unlikely.

    YMMV. CCPD.

    Tom

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by ratagonia View Post

    Much of the heat transfer of a warm Pirana is via radiation, which goes up as the 5th power of the temperature difference, so as the Pirana gets hotter, it radiates A LOT more energy.


    Tom
    5th power? What is that, "Jone's Law"?

    Nat
    Last edited by nat; 07-05-2011 at 04:58 PM. Reason: adding question mark

  8. #7
    This was discussed back on the ACA site a few years ago. Some interesting tests took place http://www.canyoneering.net/forums/s...highlight=heat
    Bryan in Las Vegas

  9. #8
    Content Provider Emeritus ratagonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Quiet and charming: Mount Carmel
    Posts
    7,158
    Quote Originally Posted by nat View Post
    5th power? What is that, "Jone's Law"?

    Nat
    Oops, OK, my memory perfect less than is...

    4th power, according to the Stefan-Boltzmann Law: q = ε σ (Th4 - Tc4) Ac

    http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ra...fer-d_431.html

    T

  10. #9
    Nerd Alert!

    Since we will all benefit from radiation (not radioactivity--infrared radiation) cooling our descender we will get the best results when the descenders are black in color (for example, look at the heat sink on the processor in most PC's) . It also works in our favor that the temperature for the math Tom shows is degrees Kelvin (zero degrees F= 255 degrees Kelvin). Another consideration is size. A descender with larger surface area will run cooler.

    There is also the question of "if is it better to go fast or slow"? Faster builds up more heat but the contact time is less, slower creates less heat but the contact time is longer. So what's the answer--it depends. It's kind of like when I'm out for a run and need to drop a load. Should I run faster to get to the bathroom (that makes the urge worse) or run slower (I'll have to hold it longer). It all depends--do I feel like running with just one sock on or not?

    I'm going to borrow the infrared camera from work and make some measurements next time I'm out practicing. I'm just curious how hot things do get.

  11. #10
    Content Provider Emeritus ratagonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Quiet and charming: Mount Carmel
    Posts
    7,158
    Quote Originally Posted by agostinone View Post
    Nerd Alert!

    Since we will all benefit from radiation (not radioactivity--infrared radiation) cooling our descender we will get the best results when the descenders are black in color (for example, look at the heat sink on the processor in most PC's) . It also works in our favor that the temperature for the math Tom shows is degrees Kelvin (zero degrees F= 255 degrees Kelvin). Another consideration is size. A descender with larger surface area will run cooler.

    There is also the question of "if is it better to go fast or slow"? Faster builds up more heat but the contact time is less, slower creates less heat but the contact time is longer. So what's the answer--it depends. It's kind of like when I'm out for a run and need to drop a load. Should I run faster to get to the bathroom (that makes the urge worse) or run slower (I'll have to hold it longer). It all depends--do I feel like running with just one sock on or not?

    I'm going to borrow the infrared camera from work and make some measurements next time I'm out practicing. I'm just curious how hot things do get.
    It's been quite some time since I did my time at the Massachusetts Tool or Die Company, but...

    Colleague Agostino, I expect better...

    I does not matter that the Temperature is in Kelvin - the energy transferred is as the 4th power of the temperature difference - the base makes no difference. The units will be consist - metric or Anglish.

    At the temps we are talking, the color in visible light makes no diff. The emissivity in the IR does, and certainly a coating could be applied that would increase the emissivity. What it would look like in the visible spectrum, if anything??? Hard to say.

    The speed does make a huge difference. What we are trying to determine is the maximum temperature reached - is it enough to singe the rope? There are several ways to look at the problem, and thankfully we are blessed by an acute lack of data, therefore it is all conjecture. We could make some guesses, then calculate say, the max temperature reached at a certain rappelling speed. Or the relationship between rappelling speed and max temperature reached.

    Yes, a larger device will run cooler - more mass, more surface area. But these factors might be overwhelmed by the location of heat build up in different devices. Some will transfer more of the descent energy into the rope, some will retain it for themselves.

    Since we do not hear of people burning through devices on rappel, I think we can assume that the # of incidents of such is quite small. Losing control while on rappel - much bigger.

    Still worried? Bring a squirt bottle. Stop every now and again and give your device a squirt.

    Of course, now you are going to start worrying about annealing your device mid-rappel -- uh oh, then what happens???

    Tom

  12. #11
    Bogley BigShot oldno7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    We're all here, because we ain't all there.
    Posts
    19,424
    I believe the only real world testing I've seen was done by ATS.

    Can't find their video right now.

  13. #12
    Content Provider Emeritus ratagonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Quiet and charming: Mount Carmel
    Posts
    7,158
    Quote Originally Posted by oldno7 View Post
    I believe the only real world testing I've seen was done by ATS.

    Can't find their video right now.
    http://www.youtube.com/ATSadventures#p/u/3/APreETBFDHw

    It wasn't much of a test. And it wasn't really very real-world.

    T

  14. #13
    Slow and steady is the best way to descend on a long free hanging rappel. The device avoids overheating and you don't stop at any spot to burn the rope.

  15. #14
    Nerd Alert--Continued.

    Sensei Tom, I too have been away from academia for a long time. I may be confused not by the heat transfer but by the algebra but I think that it may make a difference that the temperature is in Kelvin. I think the formula is ~(Th^4-Tc^4) which should yield a different answer than (Th-Tc)^4.

    I to am not aware of a case of the rope actually getting scorched. I just got all excited at a chance to see how heat transfer theory applies to one of my hobbies (I think that qualifies me as a nerd--crap maybe I should have kept this to myself).

  16. #15
    Mountain Man
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Heart: Escalante. Reality: CO
    Posts
    510
    Why are you concerned with radiation? Conduction should be the issue.

  17. #16
    Content Provider Emeritus ratagonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Quiet and charming: Mount Carmel
    Posts
    7,158
    Quote Originally Posted by agostinone View Post
    Nerd Alert--Continued.

    Sensei Tom, I too have been away from academia for a long time. I may be confused not by the heat transfer but by the algebra but I think that it may make a difference that the temperature is in Kelvin. I think the formula is ~(Th^4-Tc^4) which should yield a different answer than (Th-Tc)^4.

    I to am not aware of a case of the rope actually getting scorched. I just got all excited at a chance to see how heat transfer theory applies to one of my hobbies (I think that qualifies me as a nerd--crap maybe I should have kept this to myself).
    Entirely correct, Grasshopper. My apologies for questioning your nerd-dom.

    Tom

  18. #17
    Bogley BigShot oldno7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    We're all here, because we ain't all there.
    Posts
    19,424
    Quote Originally Posted by ratagonia View Post
    http://www.youtube.com/ATSadventures#p/u/3/APreETBFDHw

    It wasn't much of a test. And it wasn't really very real-world.

    T


    I agree

  19. #18
    Content Provider Emeritus ratagonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Quiet and charming: Mount Carmel
    Posts
    7,158
    Quote Originally Posted by dsr70 View Post
    Why are you concerned with radiation? Conduction should be the issue.
    The overall question is how hot does the rappel device get? Hot enough to singe the rope or burn through it?

    When we classroom that, the question becomes: what is the relationship between how fast one rappels vs. how hot the rappel device gets?

    Figuring out how much energy goes into the system is easy - it is merely the potential energy converted to heat (less the change in kinetic energy (hopefully a small number)). However, figuring out WHERE the heat goes (some into the rope, some into the rappel device); and then figuring out how fast the heat dissipates off the rappel device is more challenging.

    Since the singeing temperature for Polyester is fairly high (240 deg C), we will be dealing with circumstances where the rappel device is at quite a bit higher temperature than the surrounding environment (say, 37 deg C). Where there is a significant temperature difference, radiative heat loss tends to be the dominant heat transfer mechanism.

    The claim here is that because the heat loss is proportionate to the difference of the 4th power of the temperatures (in Kelvin), while it may be not so hard to get the rap device up to a skin-burning temperature (60 deg C) or to the point when it hisses off water that is on the rope (100 deg C), it could be quite challenging to get it up to the much higher temperature required to soften polyester (240 deg C).

    Running a spreadsheet we can see:

    Temp .......................Tc.......Th.......dif 4th powers
    deg C................ ......degK...deg K
    60 (burn skin)...........305........335........ 3.9E+09
    100 (evap H2O).........305........375........11.1E+09
    200 (almost singe)....305........475.........42.3E+09
    240 (soften poly) ......305........515.........61.7E+09

    For the Physics 101 class, we have turned the problem around to "How fast do I need to rappel to achieve X temperature?". Since the energy input is proportional to rappel speed, I think we can see:

    A. observation: we have all heated up a rappel device hot enough to burn ourselves...
    B. observation: many of us have heated up a rappel device hot enough to evaporate the water on the rope with a hiss...
    C. getting to 200 deg C requires rapping 3.8X faster than B.
    D. getting to 240 deg C (the danger point) requires rapping 5.5X faster than B.

    I am positing a very long rappel, where we are looking at the steady state - perhaps this is an oversimplification...

    Of course, without actually measuring things in the field, it is quite difficult to reach any ACTUAL conclusions.

    Tom

  20. #19
    The big yellow one is the sun!
    Bryan in Las Vegas

  21. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by scubabryan View Post
    The big yellow one is the sun!
    Well said Copernicus!

Visitors found this page by searching for:

danger ofnoverheating descender

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •