Death Penalty? Why not.

[JP]

Baby Sitters Videotaped Themselves in Sex Acts With Kids, Police Say

Saturday , March 14, 2009

VEEDERSBURG, Ind.

[KapitanSparrow]

Yep, I've got no problem with DP in this case. Fcuk'em!


Or life sentence without the possibility of parole.

[JP]

Or life sentence without the possibility of parole.

No reason to keep these two alive.

[KapitanSparrow]

That's why NASA should look into likely-to-fail manned space missions featuring people like these. The criminals should do their part for science. Send them into space in search of new planets to colonize

[Deuce]

Or life sentence without the possibility of parole.

No reason to keep these two alive.

EXACTLY, I have no desire to have the government spend tax dollars keeping these pieces of chit alive on my dime for the next 50ish years.

[DiscGo]

Surprise surprise: I believe they should receive the death penalty.

[denaliguide]

do it!

[hank moon]

If death for these guys, then how about death to all the millions of crappy parents in the world that mess up their kids (many for life) on a daily basis?

Death to the child-molesting clergy!

Death to all members of churches that ever supported said clergy!

Death to tithers!

And to the tax collectors, barrel makers, and tissue paper salesmen!

[hank moon]

EXACTLY, I have no desire to have the government spend tax dollars keeping these pieces of chit alive on my dime for the next 50ish years.

I imagine that DP prisoners cost taxpayers more in the long run...maybe CardShark has some data?

[JP]

Nothing like supporting baby rapers Oh, wait...I almost forgot. They must be victims themselves....

[Deuce]

If death for these guys, then how about death to all the millions of crappy parents in the world that mess up their kids (many for life) on a daily basis?

Death to the child-molesting clergy!

Death to all members of churches that ever supported said clergy!

Death to tithers!

And to the tax collectors, barrel makers, and tissue paper salesmen!

Mr. Moon....I will assume you are trolling with your comments....so I will bite.....

You cannot differentiate the difference between what these individuals did and "general" poor parenting.....support of criminals, tithers....bla..bla...bla....?????

The unfortunate thing is all of this is the overall costs to the taxpayer.... Costs more to prosecute a death penalty case.....costs more to go through all the appeals process(automatic)....costs more to house on death row....and to ultimately carry out the process....bla...bla...bla.....

IMO....video evidence, witnesses/victims to corroborate....for lack of better words, open and shut case.... Take them out in the desert, put them down, leave them for the family or the varmints.....

I would be considered VERY liberal by most on this forum.....but this is one area that my views................ Are you phucking kidding me, they videoed themselves sexually molesting infants...... Yea, time for the dirt nap....

[psl53]

If death for these guys, then how about death to all the millions of crappy parents in the world that mess up their kids (many for life) on a daily basis?

Death to the child-molesting clergy!

Death to all members of churches that ever supported said clergy!

Death to tithers!

And to the tax collectors, barrel makers, and tissue paper salesmen!

Hank,
You're on the right track, it's a good start.
Peter

[hank moon]

You cannot differentiate the difference between what these individuals did and "general" poor parenting...

I do not know what they did. A critical reading of the tidbit JP offered could mean only that the couple taped themselves having sex in the presence of the children. Very little facts here...lots of hasty conclusions.

[Deuce]

You cannot differentiate the difference between what these individuals did and "general" poor parenting...

I do not know what they did. A critical reading of the tidbit JP offered could mean only that the couple taped themselves having sex in the presence of the children. Very little facts here...lots of hasty conclusions.

You cannot really believe that someone was charged felony child molestation for making a innocent "home porno" and a child entered the room, which we know how the tape would play out...........

Again.....I will go back to my original post.....assuming you were not just trolling for entertainment.... Fire away and tell me if you can tell the difference between these crimes....

These people raped infants, please do not tell me your argument is semantics......

[hank moon]

You cannot really believe that someone was charged felony child molestation for making a innocent "home porno" and a child entered the room, which we know how the tape would play out.

Seriously, Deuce. I neither said nor implied the above. I said that facts are lacking. You say "these people raped infants" yet you do not know this (unless you have info other than that already presented - if so, please share). It seems that those hollering for the death penalty have reached conclusions w/o facts. Is this an online form of "herd mentality," "crowd hysteria" or the like?

Where did you learn that anyone involved was charged with "felony child molestation"? Suspects must be charged in order to be held for any length of time. That's part of the so-called "rule of law" here in the U.S.A. Charges don't mean much unless they stick in the end (i.e. conviction is obtained). Of course, you guys might be right in guessing these folks are "baby rapists," but that is not yet established as fact.

hank

[Deuce]

Seriously, Deuce. I neither said nor implied the above. I said that facts are lacking.

No, you made an ignorant argument in an attempt to troll IMO.....

You say "these people raped infants" yet you do not know this (unless you have info other than that already presented - if so, please share).

A couple who ran a baby-sitting service out of their home videotaped themselves performing sex acts with children, some as young as 2 months old, police said Friday.

Stephen E. Quick, 31, and Samantha Light, 25, both of Veedersburg in western Indiana, were being held on $100,000 bond in Fountain County Jail. Both faced preliminary charges of child molestation and child exploitation. Jail staff did not know whether either one had an attorney.

Police who searched the couple's home found a videotape depicting sex acts involving Quick and Light and at least four different children between the ages of 2 months and 6 years old, said Fountain County Sheriff's Deputy Bob Kemp.
"In 15 years of doing this job, it's the worst thing I've ever seen or imagined," he told WRTV. "Just horrible, just horrible It's a new low."

Where did you learn that anyone involved was charged with "felony child molestation"? Suspects must be charged in order to be held for any length of time. That's part of the so-called "rule of law" here in the U.S.A. Charges don't mean much unless they stick in the end (i.e. conviction is obtained). Of course, you guys might be right in guessing these folks are "baby rapists," but that is not yet established as fact.

No....they would be held for 72 hours while the DA looked at the PC(probable cause statement)....when it would be decided if a case could be made.... Fact is, with what we have here.....(most would be kept out of the public eye and saved for a possible trial) this is a done deal....

Again....IMO, you were trolling....and I jumped in.....still waiting for any substantial rebuttal......

Fact is, I have the fortunate.....or unfortunate....opportunity to have some direct contact with individuals in this arena. When comments are made, like the one I enlarged above......this is live changing, not only for the victims and the victims families.....but even for the individuals who have to be directly involved in these cases. This chit doesn't go away when they clock out a the end of the day.....

[hank moon]

Repeating news stories, allegations and police quotes does not establish any facts...

even with big fonts and stuff.

Substantial rebuttal? Hard to do without facts.

[Deuce]

Mr. Moon,

Just as a clarification.....and to put this in perspective..... I am no angry with you or sitting on this end of the computer with fire and brimstone, sweat on the brow and whatever else....

I do not think you are a sympathizer of those that prey on children or the like..... I do not mean to imply that if you felt that was my intention.....

I just thought you made a ignorant comment and replied.....nothing more or less.....

[Deuce]

Repeating news stories, allegations and police quotes does not establish any facts...

even with big fonts and stuff.

Substantial rebuttal? Hard to do without facts.

You are back-peddling......

Of course we do not have facts.....we are talking on an Internet forum....reading a news report. What we have is a police report(not only victim statement, but video evidence) released to the public, which will end up in court....and two individuals booked into a jail and apparently charged with a few crimes.....

What more do you want....? We are not going to try the case here.......


We have what we have......if this was all a dream and we didn't have the video tape, victim/witnesses and police that watched it and interviews them......we could just assume it was all just a sick joke, right?

[hank moon]

No worries, Deuce. I'm not clear on what you are calling "ignorant" - perhaps it was the hyperbolic stuff. That was done in jest to highlight the irrationality of calling for killing w/o knowing the facts of the matter.

JP: couldn't this just be another trick of the liberal media?