View Poll Results: Should the final drop in Mindbender be bolted?
- Voters
- 26. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes! Definitely! I'll be replacing the ones you removed!
3 11.54% -
Probably. I prefer bolts.
5 19.23% -
Indifferent - I wouldn't place bolts there, but I don't oppose them either.
4 15.38% -
Probably Not. I prefer natural anchors.
7 26.92% -
Definitely not! I'll be pulling the next set of bolts that crop up there!
7 26.92%
Results 1 to 20 of 105
Thread: Bolts versus needless risk
-
05-24-2008, 04:11 PM #1
Bolts versus needless risk
Is preserving the nature of a canyon(ie, no bolts) worth the needless risk of human life?
-
05-24-2008 04:11 PM # ADS
-
05-24-2008, 05:32 PM #2
Re: Bolts versus needless risk
Originally Posted by qedcook
-
05-24-2008, 07:37 PM #3
perhaps you'd like to start this thread in the canyoneering section.
in any case the bolt/preservation issue is not as cut and dry as you lay out.
welcome to the forum.
-
05-24-2008, 07:58 PM #4
Re: Bolts versus needless risk
Originally Posted by qedcook
-
05-25-2008, 08:34 AM #5
Re: Bolts versus needless risk
Originally Posted by qedcook
OH BOY......here we go again....
I agree with Stefan here in that this issue isn't as black and white as you put it. In MOST cases, bolts are unnecessary (probably 95%). There are some instances where bolts are needed, but those are usually emergency situations.
For some reason there is a strong correlation between those with little canyoneering experience and those who like to use bolts.It's only "science" if it supports the narrative.
-
05-25-2008, 08:49 AM #6
In response to rockgremlin.
I have tons of canyon experience and I have never placed a bolt in any canyon I have ever been to, climbing or canyoneering.
I agree that natural anchoring can be safely used 95% of the the time, but I'm talking about the other 5%.
-
05-25-2008, 08:55 AM #7Originally Posted by qedcook
Oh ya...welcome to the forum!It's only "science" if it supports the narrative.
-
05-25-2008, 09:14 AM #8
I know I'm going to hit a soft spot with people by bringing this canyon up but what does everyone think about Mind Bender? I've never done it but I've seen the pictures of the anchors (who hasn't) and it has to make you wonder if one of those anchors are ever going to give out on someone.
-
05-25-2008, 09:33 AM #9
You mean that final rappel? It does look a little dicey rapping from that deadman, but it's held out just fine so far. The trick with that is to double-check and/or rebuild/rebury it if in doubt.
From what I hear, that final rap has been bolted recently anyways...It's only "science" if it supports the narrative.
-
05-25-2008, 02:37 PM #10Originally Posted by qedcook
mindbender should be kept au natural.
in regards to the bolt, i hope folks realize that it may not be there in the long term and should come prepared to inspect/construct the anchor.
-
05-25-2008, 03:36 PM #11Originally Posted by qedcook
The geometry in MB is particularly favorable, and there is certainly plenty of deadman building material at the bottom of the rappel, so all but the least-competent should have no problem building a deadman in this location.
Tom
-
05-25-2008, 03:50 PM #12Originally Posted by rockgremlin
The difficulties found in R and X canyons (at least, SLOT-R and SLOT-X canyons) are rarely of a nature that a bolt kit would be useful at all. There are a few canyons where I would carry a bolt kit, but most of those involve long drops (>200 feet expected) with uncertain anchors in *new* canyons; in most *new* canyons, we bring tools (lots of webbing, potshots, omnisling, a strong team with varied skills) and experience to the task, with a zeal for solving the problems, leaving minimal stuff behind and without placing bolts.
There is NEVER the suggestion of compromising personal safety. I am, personally, very aware that what we do has substantial risk, and that ALL the risks that we can manage must be managed. I do not rappel off anchors that are not 100% secure (knock on wood).
Some have argued that by NOT leaving solid, reliable, three-gued-in-bolt anchors at every 5 foot drop, we are being irresponsible with the lives of the clueless noobs who will descend the canyon afterward, drawn by my beautiful pictures on the Latest Rave. This is not a viewpoint I share, in fact, I have an opposite claim: by installing bolts at drops where they are not 'needed', we will communicate to C. Noob that the solution to the problem is to place bolts. C. Noob is ill-served by this message as: 1. bolts are very hard to place in soft rock; and 2. there are plenty of drops out there that surprisingly do not already have bolts installed. C. Noob is better served (and safer) by learning how to build anchors in the wild using primitive tools (webbing, potshots).
That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it! (Unless, Q.E.D., you are a sock puppet of Brian Cabe, and have just successfully chummed me).
Tom
-
05-25-2008, 08:36 PM #13Originally Posted by ratagoniaIt's only "science" if it supports the narrative.
-
05-25-2008, 09:04 PM #14Originally Posted by rockgremlin
Tom
-
05-26-2008, 12:28 AM #15
I personally think the deadman in mindbender is sufficient, the rats nest of backups/equalizers seems to mainly be because the rappel is long, and therefore people tend to think it needs to be backed up 4 or 5 times "just in case." As long as people inspect the main anchor they should be good. Back it up with meat for everyone but the last man, if it doesn't budge for anyone else, what are the chances of it failing for the last man? I've been canyoneering with Tom a fair amount lately, even in some "new" unexplored canyons. It's pretty impressive what can be done with an omnisling and some potshots, we were even able to ghost one canyon on our last trip without compromising safety. Potshots are my new favorite canyoneering tool and if you become an expert at using them like Tom is, they are a very valuable tool. They can be used to build retreivable anchors, used to back up sketchy anchors, used to haul rocks from the bottom of a rap for anchor building, and even used as booties around camp when backpacking (this is an expert only technique), oh yea and they are great for escaping potholes.
-
05-26-2008, 07:45 AM #16Originally Posted by rockgremlin
-
05-26-2008, 08:08 AM #17Originally Posted by SLCmntjunkie
... and they probably won't be around for very long ...
thanks for the info.
It was my first descent so I'm not familiar with what anchor use to be there but there was no sign of a deadman.
it is not uncommon that one may come to this exit falls to find no constructed natural anchor. if the natural anchor is not buried and within reach, above the 10-foot drop right before the exit falls, there are boulders which may be used to construct such an anchor.
note this is the crux of the canyon which inspired the canyon's name (see story).
given the abundance of boulders and the lip of the final pothole, the drop easily lends itself to natural anchors.
see this page for a photographic example:
http://canyoneeringusa.com/utah/roost/
-
05-26-2008, 08:54 AM #18
I was a little disappointed to see the bolts. I kind of enjoy building natural anchors and trust them over bolts in most cases. I guess nothing was stopping me from building one anyway, it certainly wouldn't of been difficult, but I'm not opposed to using bolts if they are there and in good shape.
-
05-26-2008, 09:14 AM #19Originally Posted by stefan
Tom
-
05-26-2008, 09:32 AM #20
Natural anchors are part of the game. Sometimes bolts just dumb down the canyon (like with Yankee Doodle, etc). No natural anchors, well maybe bolts are needed. When a tree or a chockstone can hold several thousand pounds of pressure why are bolts needed?
If bolts are your game there are several canyons that have bolts at every drop, stick to those. (not directed towards anyone, just general observation)
I will be the first to admit my natural anchor skills need to be upgraded (to more of an advanced set). I need to go out with others more experienced (want to go?). For this reason I stay away from those more complex anchor problem canyons.
I agree that every anchor should be inspected. What I don't get is why people suspect natural anchors but not bolts; it's called sandstone for a reason? Just as with natural anchors should be inspected if they were constructed or placed correctly so should a bolt. How do you know the bolts were placed correctly (rock quality, distance, etc), plus the beef of the anchor is hidden in the rock?
play safe & read the route descriptions
Similar Threads
-
Bad Bolts in Rock of Ages
By Iceaxe in forum CanyoneeringReplies: 61Last Post: 05-18-2011, 08:02 AM -
Bolts IN and OUT in Glen Canyon
By ratagonia in forum CanyoneeringReplies: 4Last Post: 10-07-2008, 10:40 AM -
FYI - Lucky Charms bolts
By gwest in forum CanyoneeringReplies: 4Last Post: 10-31-2007, 05:56 PM -
Roxio 10 Versus Nero 8
By Sombeech in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 10-12-2007, 06:53 PM -
father reaction versus mother one
By hesse15 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 01-06-2006, 10:57 AM
Visitors found this page by searching for:
Outdoor Forum