Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: So what if national park fees go up?

  1. #1
    Bogley BigShot
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Just a few miles from Zion National Park
    Posts
    8,456

    So what if national park fees go up?

    Psssstttt... just buy the Interagency pass!

    Opinion Article....

    A day at Disneyland costs a family of four at least $232, not counting Mickey Mouse ears. At Six Flags Magic Mountain, the admission price would be at least $180.

    A seven-day pass to enter Yellowstone National Park costs $25 per car, which means that the same family spending a week among bison, elk, geysers and grizzlies would pay the equivalent of 89 cents per person, per day.

    No matter how you measure it, national parks are a recreational bargain. Sure, it costs money to drive or fly to them, and more to stay overnight once you're there. But all destination attractions have costs associated with their enjoyment. The price of admission is but one part of the overall cost of a visit, and in the case of the national parks, it's a minor one.

    Which is why it's perplexing to see such an outcry over news that the Park Service wants to raise entrance fees at 135 sites over the next two years.

    Since superintendents at the affected parks began notifying their neighbors earlier this year about the planned increases - a task apparently handed them by administrators in Washington, who never made a formal announcement of the proposal - critics have condemned the plan for a number of reasons.

    Their principal arguments are economic: Tourism-dependent communities fret that higher fees will reduce visitation and cut into profits, while others argue that the increases will keep out those of limited financial means.

    It's true, in theory at least, that raising the price of something should decrease demand for it. And those who claim fee increases will keep people away from parks point to data they believe supports their assertion: National park visitation has declined since Congress authorized a round of price increases in 1996 under the Recreational Fee Demonstration Program.

    National park use peaked in 1999 at 287.1 million visits. It than began a fairly steady decline, totaling 272.6 million in 2006. That 5 percent decline came during a time when the U.S. population increased by 6 percent. But it's simplistic to conclude from the data that higher prices alone are keeping people away from the parks. Other factors must be at work.

    For one thing, park system visitation rose in the first two years after the Fee Demo law was passed. And in a 2002 report to Congress on the program, federal land-management agencies found no significant difference in visitation trends between Fee Demo sites and locations where fees had remained unchanged. It's equally telling that visitor counts at Great Smoky Mountains, the most heavily used national park, also dropped from 1999 to 2006. But higher entrance fees can't be the reason, because Great Smoky Mountains charges no entry fee.

    The argument that fee increases will prevent working-class families of limited income from enjoying public lands also is unpersuasive, for it ignores the broader economic context in which those fees are imposed. For example, the current Park Service proposal is to raise the $20 Yosemite entrance fee to $25 in 2008. Other popular parks in the West would see similar increases: From $20 to $25 at Zion, $10 to $20 at Arches and Canyonlands. In strict percentage terms, those are pretty big boosts, and business interests in nearby towns have voiced loud opposition. But according to the AAA's fuel-cost calculator, a round-trip drive from Los Angeles to Yosemite in a two-year-old domestic minivan will eat up $124.56 worth of gasoline. A $5 increase on top of that is unlikely to be the deciding factor when a family considers whether to plan a Yosemite vacation.

    There are probably many factors contributing to the nationwide drop in park visitation: overcrowding at popular sites, an aging American population, and competing opportunities - what researchers have dubbed the "nature vs. Nintendo" effect.

    The trend is troubling in that it could signal a weakening of the personal connection and commitment Americans have to the great treasures of our natural, historical and cultural heritage. On the other hand, it's absurd to expect a finite amount of parkland to accommodate a continually increasing number of people. Anyone who has driven into Yosemite Valley on a holiday weekend is unlikely to regard a drop in park visitation as entirely a bad thing.

    Slightly higher user fees are unlikely to have much effect on park use, but they could have a significant effect on the quality of the park experience. Most of that money will stay at individual parks, where it can be spent on upkeep and repairs -- the sort of unglamorous expenditures that typically get shortchanged in the politically driven federal budget process. Smaller crowds and plumbing that works - what's not to like?



    John Krist is a contributor to Writers on the Range, a service of High Country News in Paonia, Colorado (hcn.org). He is a columnist for the Ventura County Star in California.

    http://www.summitdaily.com/article/2...UMNS/105150050

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Good points. It seems that the same people who complain that the NPS budget is too low, also complain about the fee increase. I buy a park pass every year with the "sticker" on it. Mine's about to expire, so I'll get whatever the new thing is the next time I get to a NP or Forest Service fee area.

  4. #3
    it would seem the most important people it matters to are those with low income. i don't know what i think about that or where to draw the line; but i wonder if provisions could be made for some people based upon their income they claim on their taxes? perhaps applying for a lower cost permit which can be attained via the mail.

  5. #4
    I'm surprised to hear that visitation at National Parks is declining. My own experience would suggest an increase in attendance, but my visits are largely off-season to avoid the crowds. Maybe the aging of America has more people able to go off-season, while younger families are choosing to go elsewhere. I suspect that kids influence vacation plans in favor of the Disney-type destinations, which is a shame. They need to be learning about our great outdoors.

    Anyway, I agree the admissions should be increased and applied to improvements. It's easy for me to say that, as I have the golden Age Passport (one of the greatest bargains ever given us old farts). It shouldn't dissuade people from visiting our parks as much as the increase in gas prices. I would even agree to a fee of reasonable amount for holders of the Golden Age Passport.

    I'd really like to see more parks created, and I'm certain there are suitable properties that could be developed. However, if attendance is dropping, I suppose there is little justification.
    Stan

    Check out my photo gallery at www.pbase.com/sparker1

  6. #5
    Bogley BigShot
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Just a few miles from Zion National Park
    Posts
    8,456
    Quote Originally Posted by sparker1
    I'm surprised to hear that visitation at National Parks is declining. My own experience would suggest an increase in attendance, but my visits are largely off-season to avoid the crowds. Maybe the aging of America has more people able to go off-season, while younger families are choosing to go elsewhere. I suspect that kids influence vacation plans in favor of the Disney-type destinations, which is a shame. They need to be learning about our great outdoors.

    Anyway, I agree the admissions should be increased and applied to improvements. It's easy for me to say that, as I have the golden Age Passport (one of the greatest bargains ever given us old farts). It shouldn't dissuade people from visiting our parks as much as the increase in gas prices. I would even agree to a fee of reasonable amount for holders of the Golden Age Passport.

    I'd really like to see more parks created, and I'm certain there are suitable properties that could be developed. However, if attendance is dropping, I suppose there is little justification.
    It sure seems to be up in Zion!

    I too would love to see more parks!

Similar Threads

  1. Auyuittuq National Park
    By goofball in forum Backpacking & Camping
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-22-2011, 11:45 AM
  2. [Trip Report] Zion National Park
    By rover in forum Hiking, Scrambling & Peak Bagging
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-06-2010, 05:11 PM
  3. National Geographic Channel Denali National Park
    By JP in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-28-2008, 01:08 PM
  4. Who's been to Glacier National Park?
    By Wasatch Rebel in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 08:27 PM
  5. new national park pass & blm day use fees
    By mfshop in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-02-2007, 03:55 PM

Visitors found this page by searching for:

Outdoor Forum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •