Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: Better than Google Earth?
-
05-30-2006, 10:28 PM #1
Better than Google Earth?
Thanks to FlyfishermanMike for bringing this awesome program to my attention. It's NASA's version of Google Earth (or is Google Earth, Google's version of this program?) Whatever it is it rocks. For google earth geeks this is much better for exploring the outdoors in areas that have crappy resolution. The only downside is the high quality areas are in black and white. You can switch to see topo maps of the area along with all kinds of other cool stuff. You can even explore the moon, mars, and other planets. Here are some examples of how superior the detail is to GE. For my slower connection and no 3D accelerator it's a bit sluggish, and if I want really high quality pics/maps I have to be patient and let it sit for a few minutes and load. Also make sure you turn on the 1M Ortho photos for highest detail.
http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/
Eric.
-
05-30-2006 10:28 PM # ADS
-
05-30-2006, 10:38 PM #2
I read the title, and thought "what is this blasphemy he speaketh", and then realized, you have a great point.
There are too many areas where GE has poor resolution, and I've seen this nasa program before. I love the color stuff, but where GE fails, this program really covers for it. Zion, and some other southern central Utah sections have dissappointed me with GE. Thanks shaggy.
-
05-31-2006, 05:55 AM #3
Wow! Much better.....
-
05-31-2006, 06:39 AM #4
Wow, thanks for the info
-
05-31-2006, 07:15 AM #5
eeek!!! 1 step closer to virtual reality. sheeeet, we may never have to actually step foot into the canyons themselves oneday
but seriously, wild wild stuff!!! most impressive.
i should just point out for the mac users, that much to our disappointment worldwind is not yet available for mac. sos.
however, if you are interested in uniformly medium-high res images of the US....in 2D....you can find them on yahoo's latest maps program
http://maps.yahoo.com/beta/
-
05-31-2006, 07:19 AM #6
Thanks Shagmeister, this looks pretty useful. I can't stand the horrible resolution on Google Earth for the Swell and other surrounding areas. You showed us that Google Earth could use the DOQ overlay images, but I just wish it could do it by default with a simple click.
-
05-31-2006, 07:47 AM #7
I've tried Google Earth and its pretty much useless..... I'll give this new program a try. Now Shaggy do me a favor with a couple of pics I would like to see..... I found Zero Gravity using the USGS sat photos. I would like to see a pic of Zero-G using Google Earth and this new program to see if it can be used to find new canyons.
Pics of Leprechaun would be good also.
Here is Lep using the USGS sat photos
http://climb-utah.com/Powell/Files/LeprechaunSat.jpg
I'm mostly interested in a tool better then the sat photos for finding good canyons.
-
05-31-2006, 05:29 PM #8Originally Posted by Iceaxe
Eric.
-
06-01-2006, 02:39 PM #9
Here are some pictures of Zero G and Leprechaun. I saved some of the topo's and then some of the sat images.
Eric.
-
06-01-2006, 03:30 PM #10
Thanks Shaggy..... After that demo I'm sticking with the overhead USGS sat photos. They appear to be much easier to read and find slots from.
-
06-01-2006, 04:05 PM #11Originally Posted by Iceaxe
-
06-01-2006, 06:01 PM #12
How are getting the high def. pics? I can't seam to figure that part out???
-
06-01-2006, 08:37 PM #13
Never mind, I got it.
-
06-09-2006, 09:18 PM #14
Re: Better than Google Earth?
Originally Posted by shaggy125
Similar Threads
-
Embed Google Maps - NOW Google Earth!
By Sombeech in forum General DiscussionReplies: 5Last Post: 04-27-2010, 03:47 PM -
Panoramio / Google Earth
By LOAH in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 03-03-2008, 12:35 PM -
Google Earth Revamped?
By shaggy125 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 14Last Post: 03-02-2007, 03:38 PM -
Google Earth
By rockgremlin in forum General DiscussionReplies: 7Last Post: 01-13-2006, 09:55 AM -
Google Earth
By derstuka in forum Mountain Biking & CyclingReplies: 33Last Post: 07-25-2005, 09:23 AM