,.,.,.
Printable View
,.,.,.
,,..,,.
,,...,,.
:2thumbs:
To me the Nunes memo was a big disappointment, especially after the "bigger than Watergate" grandstanding comments.
But even bigger and more disappointing was the Democratic nothing burger memo. Talk about a fart in church.
Is there anyone that believes the FBI or DOJ was not politicized, which is what this is really all about?
So what did the Democrat memo say anyways? I haven't read it, nor am I interested, but I'm assuming it's a LOT of talking around and around about accusations here and there, excuses around every corner.
Honestly I felt the Democrats memo was 10 pages of nothing. It mostly stated that Nunes was correct but it's not really a big deal. YMMV
:roflol::roflol::roflol:
amazing how liberal progressives can be wrong all the time.
This thread was great.
pee tape...:roflol:
little throwback from a year or so ago.
So everything in the Nunes "memo" has proven true, based on Horowitz's findings.
Everything in the schitt memo was fabricated,pretty much what we have grown to expect.
This is why, after the Horowitz report, Nunes stated his memo had been vindicated and proven true, which is now based on proven facts.
This is/was the basis for the mueller investigation, which should have never been allowed based on lies and falsified documents.
And the dems are mad because Trump isn't playing along with their circus.
Which they deem obstruction.
and--as Paul Harvey used to say--"and now you know the rest of the story"
Watch and learn about corruption
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo