The Scientific method Vs. The Creationist method (PIC)

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/2...tionismjd7.gif

:lol8:

:lol8: :2thumbs:

:haha:

a flow-chart for clarification of the methods

:lol8: I think you forgot to include "Life starts as lightning strikes mud"

:roflol: :roflol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sombeech

:lol8: I think you forgot to include "Life starts as lightning strikes mud"

---

so far this thread has only been about methods, not about details.

nevertheless, life is pretty damn amazing ... it's no wonder religions have sprung about glorifying its inception to a maker.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stefan

nevertheless, life is pretty damn amazing ... it's no wonder religions have sprung about glorifying its inception to a maker.

---

What is science's latest theory on how life began?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stefan

nevertheless, life is pretty damn amazing ... it's no wonder religions have sprung about glorifying its inception to a maker.

---

concur.


I especially like the little half-moons and crosses circling the "ignore contradicting evidence" balloon. :lol8: Nice touch. :lol8:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jumar

What is science's latest theory on how life began?

---

well there is no one "theory" or standard model. there are a number of models often with common elements ... and there is the natural question of whether it (or some of it) began on earth or elsewhere.

though i DID just read somewhere that it might have started by cosmic rays impinging on a funky pothole in a slot canyon in southern utah. :wink:

or maybe that's just where canyoneers think "life" began.

Quote:

---

though i DID just read somewhere that it might have started by cosmic rays impinging on a funky pothole in a slot canyon in southern utah.

---

That's the most plausible theory I've heard yet! :haha: