coming soon........
Printable View
coming soon........
Very good explanation of what is to come and a rough timeline.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...rruption-memo/
All citations of info are at the bottom of article,
Yawn.... call me when I can actually read the memo, everything so far is just a dog and pony show.
And I wish some would stop over selling this as bigger than Watergate because odds are it's not even close and when it doesn't meet expectations the public will instantly lose interest. If by some chance it is bigger there will be no need for the sales hype.
More propaganda pushed by Russian bots...sweet! Can't wait!
http://thehill.com/policy/technology...lease-shocking
http://www.businessinsider.com/relea...ccounts-2018-1
You are a ****ing idiot man...
Well that escalated...
Nah, you meant the Russian that sold the fake Da Vinci and bought Trump's house in Florida...Dmitry Rybolovlev. $40 million house bought for $95 million...but, I'm sure no one owes anyone any favors...(har har).
Maybe he's seen the pee tape?
Dude, there's a pee tape...is that what the memo will reveal? Cool....
Here is some reaction to the memo by those who have seen it....
https://youtu.be/4hzvDXK0I_Q
This should be good. Certain people pissed off already before it's gone public :haha:
I see you noticed @DirkHammergate posted.
LMAO
So of course, I really don't follow politics a ton, I just see certain people pissed off about something and then I go check it out.
This is the first I've heard of any Memo. Where did it come from, how did it come to be?
Basically the jist is it's supposed to prove Obama was using the FBI and DOJ (Federal Government) to spy on Trump and his campaign, which is a direct violation of the 4th Amendment, not to mention an abuse of power.
The "meno" has yet to be released as it is currently classified and has only been viewed by a select few. Some are saying it's bigger then Watergate, others say it's nothing.
If you want to know more this link will give you more info:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...de-public.html
Was a memo as the result of a study done by a non-partisan research group comprised of non-politically aligned staffers. The memo outlines the activities of the government under the Foreign Intelligence Service Act. The memo is a fair and even reporting of these activities with no parsing of information and no inclusion of half truths or insinuations about any wrong doings.
Ha ha.
Just kidding. It's Republican staffers' propaganda and being pushed by Russian twitter bots. Designed to influence the public into thinking that Mueller is a bad guy on a witch hunt. Basically to discredit the Mueller investigation.
Good times!
It's nice to see Brian in SLC is keeping an open mine after never seeing or reading the memo.
It's already been proven Lorretta Lynch and Jim Comey did some shady shit, but was it illegal?
Funny... I've found most around here to be very opened minded. Beech asked an honest question to which you gave him the extreme liberal version of an answer.
Most members of Bogley look at the economy, their retirement, the value of their house and business, what's in their paycheck and make a well informed decision. Historically Americans vote with their pocket book.
But the department also said in a letter to lawmakers that its record of messages sent to and from the agent, Peter Strzok, was incomplete because the FBI, for technical reasons, had been unable to preserve and retrieve about five months' worth of communications.
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=46242355&nid=157&title=more-texts-turned-over-from-fbi-agent-taken-off-mueller-team
appears as though KSL as been hacked by Russian bots(whatever those are)
So here's how I predict it will go down. Absolutely damning evidence of corruption in the FBI and DOG, says the Right, but just another witch hunt, says the Left.
And nobody goes to prison.
Nobody charged with anything
Nothing changes, except for the increased Meme library, which is good enough for me.
^^^THIS :nod:
85% of obama era fisa warrants were illegal
The Nunes memo focuses on the FBI's use of the dossier on Trump and Russia compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele and paid for through Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
The document alleges that the FISA judge who signed off on surveillance warrants for members of Trump's team during the campaign was not given full information about the dossier that was used in at least one application, including that it was paid for by the Democratic sources, CNN reported Saturday.
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=46242906&ni...ng-fisa-abuses
The "dossier" on Trump was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon and an "unknown GOP client".
Its like a spy novel, this stuff....crazy.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3...e-of-interview
If you have never seen it watch the movie "Wag The Dog", it's a 1997 political comedy that does a great job of explaining much of this.
https://youtu.be/steA_PZPkc8
Guess we'll all learn the truth together.
If this plays out--the loud girggling noise will be the dc swamp being drained.
:roflol::roflol:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGUmfhURKcY
More than 50,000 texts were exchanged between two FBI officials who have come under fire for exchanging anti-Trump messages during the 2016 election, Attorney General Jeff Sessions revealed Monday.
The revelation came as lawmakers have been pressing for answers after revelations that the FBI “failed to preserve” five months of texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
“We will leave no stone unturned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source,” Sessions said in a statement provided to Fox News. “If we are successful, we will update the congressional committees immediately.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...ions-says.html
Does anyone really believe that the fbi "lost" 5 months of data?
I have a harder time believing two people texted each other 50k times during the election...
Geez, maybe I'm just a troglodyte.
We're talking about personal texts between two people? Probably sent on their work phones? Or, maybe IMing (or skype or whatev's?)?
Funny...I've been in long meeting presentations were folks texted back and forth just to see if they could get someone to bust out laughing...
Not sure how anyone working in government at any level isn't influenced by who they like and who they don't like.
https://www.facebook.com/AltUSNationalParkService/
Waggin' the dog fo sho!
I stand corrected, I found one everyone of you that stands in a circle and jerks each other off.
Attachment 88710
bots---I see russian bots everywhere--or NOT...
Stewart, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, told state senators the dossier was paid for by Democrats and utilized a foreign agent who "almost certainly" had contact with Russian agents, but "there is nothing in it that's true."
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=46244272&nid=757&title=rep-chris-stewart-trump-investigation-issues-extraordinarily-concerning
Joe diGenova, a former federal prosecutor lays out the Fisa/fusion/fbi/doj plot.
Interesting take. He describes what has transpired, to date, in quite good detail.
.<span style="color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=aa95jLxZfc4
,,,,
This would be great
...,,,..