Printable View
what would be the lowest diameter for a pull cord for a 120 or 200 ft rope ? Would a 5mm accessory cord ( type found at rei ) do ? or do I need something more specialized. I have my ropes but so far friends always had the pull cords... time to buy my own and I would like to go as light as possible.
thanks :)
I use a 6mm pull cord, the reason being is I feel safe enough rappeling on a 6mm cord in an emergency and I think its nice to have that option if needed. YMMV
Sent using Tapatalk
which cord do you buy ?
I use Imlay (Tom's) ropes and pull cords as they are hard to beat for the price.
Sent using Tapatalk
I've used this as a pull cord and as an emergency rappel line for years. 5mm and 5000lb test.
http://www.backcountrygear.com/maxim-tech-cord.html
Excellent. That is what I use. Very strong, light, resistant, and I would rap from it in an emergency. It has worked in even the hardest situations. Although it has a tendency to tangle more than other pull cords (bit stiff); so a rope bag can help.Quote:
Originally Posted by denaliguide
I also have used a 4mm accessory cord for shorter/clean pulls, but wouldn't recommend it as a best practice. There are many who swear by a 8mm (or 6mm if you are comfortable and experienced with that small of a rope) so you have something useful to rap from if your other rope is compromised, stuck, or needs to be extended. It is great to go light, until you get into a situation that wasn't planned for...
What do you mean 8mm in an emergency..... 8mm was my standard rope for years. :lol8:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer
FWIW: Now I use Tom's 8.3 Fire (which is noticably larger diamenter then my older 8mm stuff I was getting from anther source).
Canyon Pull Cord.
For years, a decade back, most used a 6mm NYLON accessory cord. The line was fairly supple, easy to use, but it stretched big time on long pulls and the sheath wore easily. Not a good back up for rapping. Often used for prussic building.
Rope makers then began to use various alternatives to "accessory cord" nylon. Poly/nylon mix, Poly/poly and then technora/poly or technora/nylon. Other variables exist. The poly and the technora have a more "static" feel and have less stretch; some have a much stronger sheath and some are marketed as rope vs accessory cord. I have an esprit 6mm line that is a poly blend, stiff static rope" that is used as a pull line, and also has been used to rap on. I've NOT tried the Maxxim mentioned above. May be an ok option? I've seen expensive 3mm line that is light and small.
Tom's Imlay 6mm line is poly sheath, poly core. Static feel, light/minimal stretch. I've used the product - for price and quality it's A-1. It's going to weigh more and stuff larger though than the 5mm mentioned above - I don't know the properties of that line though and don't know how it is rapping.
So, with the modern evolution of ever increasing outdoor product available, I'd AVOID a full nylon accessory cord, and probably go with the Imlay product, or maybe the Maxim above? Cost, weight, size, potential use as backup, stretch, wear, water saturation? Long ago I tried some pricey 4 & 5mm for a while and then went back to 6mm.
Yeah? Don't do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by denaliguide
Before the Internets (therefore, not easy to google), Sandy Stewart did a test of aramid-core "rope" as he was thinking about using it as fixed line in the Himalaya. Might be something in Rock and Ice, about issue 20...
Sandy Stewart: http://www.rockandice.com/articles/h...256-first-lady
(Aramid = a class of materials that includes Kevlar and Technora)
Aramid-core ropes have a significant problem, which is why you won't see many (any?) around. When you flex it, it abrades against itself and destroys itself. So while it is 5000 lbs strong when fresh off the spool, after 10 rappels, how strong is it?
My memory (always suspect) is that Sandy rappelled on it 100 times, then went and tested it, and it held 200 lbs. In other words, he is lucky he did not die (or get hurt) in the testing, because the core was gone.
The Aramid-core cords were originally made for slinging chocks, where they are not subject to flexing.
Gemini cord was developed by my pal Chuck Brainerd at Chouinard equipment to get around the self-abrading problem. Gemini cord has both aramid and spectra-like in the core, the spectra-like being self-lubricating and acts as a lubricant for the aramid. Also lighter. A better "power-cord", but the time the differences were pertinent passed 2 decades ago.
Tom
Hmmm...Quote:
Originally Posted by denaliguide
This might be of interest:
http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-...tml?startat=30
QUOTE: "This website inspired me to buy 10 foot lengths of several ropes and tech-cords and test their abrasion resistance.
My test rig differed somewhat from the link above. One end of the rope was attached to a secure anchor 10' above the ground. To keep the rope under tension, I tied into the other end so that I was suspended 3' above the ground. I then measured the time/sweat required to saw through the rope with a blunt rock.
The 5 mm maxim tech cord (polyester cover, technora core) was disturbingly easy to saw through; much easier than 8 mm perlon. The polyester cover provided marginal abrasion resistance, but the technora core cut like a hot knife through butter."
Great response and insight here. Continued flexing will damage these types of ropes. From Comparative Testing of High Strength Cord by Tom Moyer, http://user.xmission.com/~tmoyer/tes...ength_Cord.pdf:Quote:
Originally Posted by ratagonia
"The decrease in strength with use is a worry forany of the Technora, Kevlar or Vectran materials. The Gemini and the Spectra-A are also extremely stiff and
difficult to tie and untie. An 18 -foot piece makes a bulky object hanging from the harness. They make excellent
chock cord (where a stiff cord is desirable), but would make a poor cordelette. Among the high-strength cords,
Titan seems to be the most suitable material for cordelettes. The Ultratape is even better, and the webolette is an
elegant solution to multi-point anchors, although we'd prefer to see slightly higher strength on the single-strand
arms. Last, Nylon cord and webbing may be the best of all. Although heavier, they are cheap, strong, universally
available, and seem to have a virtually unlimited flex life."
Note that according to this study, the Technora drops really fast in strength after just a few flexes, but then tapers to a "steady state" breaking load of 2000 lbs even after continual flexing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer
oops
@ratagonia thanks for the links. that is good to know. the rock and ice link though just seemed to be about catherine freer. did i miss something?
Thanks everyone for all the insight....Decided on Tom's 6mm pull cord. :) Now I just have to mosey on south, pick up my gear and do some canyons.
cheers,
lofty
It was the first google result for Sandy Stewart, who was mentioned as doing Choalotse in there. Just trying to make it clear Sandy Stewart had some bonafides as a climber, though certainly lesser-known.Quote:
Originally Posted by denaliguide
Tom
YMMV but myself and most of the people I go with just bring double the rope. May have a couple of shorter working ropes to tie together for a pull on a long rappel but I do not see the savings in weight and space worth the risk of getting stuck if your ONE rope goes south. Plus you can rig multiple rappels with your extra ropes etc. Someone smarter then me should start a poll on using a pull cord vs rope.
For me it depends.... some times you need to save weight.... ever done Heaps as a pair? I have... and every ounce saved counts when you are hustling 600' of rope through a difficult canyon.
Now if you have an abundance of horsepower than by all means carry real ropes.
Sent using Tapatalk
6mm is a nice size. Imlay looks like a great deal. Best for the money IMHO.
Had the Espirit and still have the bits of it (rock fall damage). Liked it.
I think I'm using a BW searchline in 6mm. 2500lbf. Great hand. Gettin' a touch fuzzy as I've used it a bunch. Mo spendy.
I realize it is against the Bogley style-guide to provide actual vetted information, but -Quote:
Originally Posted by denaliguide
I sent in a question to New England Ropes, and here is the reply:
Quote:
Originally Posted by New England Ropes Tech Guy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ratagonia original question to NE Ropes
Thank you Tom for asking the question and posting the response, very useful. Seems the Tech Cord sheath can also slip/break > 2000 lbs on a double fisherman, so a triple is recommended.
My take away is that it is important to keep a log, inspect, and retire rope (all kinds) as appropriate prior to heading out.
That is an odd take away.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer
Normal canyoneering ropes you do not need to keep a log. EVERYTHING you need to know about the rope can be determined by inspection. 10, 100, 1000 rappels - no consequence. Cuts to the sheath fibers can happen on the first or the 1000th rappel, and make that section of the rope unsuitable.
My take away is "don't use technora-cored ropes, even the best of them, the New England Tech Cord, for rappelling".
It's a free country, you are welcome to draw your own conclusions.
Tom
Good point, and the choice of the word conclusion may have been a stretch here. I should have been more precise. By all ropes, I meant "all ropes", even those outside of the scope of canyoneering (dynamic rope that takes a fall in climbing). But this is a canyoneering forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by ratagonia
My take away from their response was that you could use their cord for a rappel in an emergency. However, I realize this thread is becoming more of a debate between weight vs. contingency, and all the pros/cons of various types of pull cords that *could* be used to rappel with in an emergency.
I was advised awhile ago by many to never carry a pull cord. Always take double the rope. Since taking that advice, I have been in situations where that added rope weight caused significantly greater problems. Would be good to know, your opinion on the use of pull cords vs. taking double the rope? It depends on the canyon? You also state on your store for the 6mm "This cord is meant to be used as a PULL CORD only. Do not rappel on this stuff - it is not strong enough for that. "
"Always" is a nasty word, as is "never".Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer
I say use it selectively.
Parts of the equation:
- how big is the group ==> for a small group the weight savings can be significant
- proficiency level ==> riskier to have less 'rope', so only use a pull cord when you have all proficient canyoneers
- class "C" ==> very risky to bring fewer ropes in a class C - easy to stick ropes - bring extras, not less than 2X.
- How many big rappels ==> if there is only one big rappel, I would have a greater tendency to use a pull cord.
- Far from the road ==> the further out a canyon is, the greater the benefit of saving the weight
- Exploration ==> adding a pull cord might be the easiest way to get more "reach'.
On our recent Full Imlay trip, we brought 1 x 185 8mm; 1 x 120 8mm and 1 x 60 foot pull cord for three people. There is one 170' rappel, and one 115' rappel (the last), and three other raps longer than 60 feet. This worked out well. It worked well.
YMMV
Tom
@ratagonia. my original "opps" post was a deletion of a unfortunate double post. i do appreciate the additional info that you posted from the manufacturer. that clears up alot. while i have used it more often as a pull cord, i have only rappeled on the tech cord a few times and for short lengths (less than 25'), and doubled. never as a primary single strand rap line. looks like it's time to retire it.
Sounds like you have 7 more to go...Quote:
Originally Posted by denaliguide
The "Escape Cord" is probably used single strand. But the exact rappel device used might be consequential.
Thus I have to say, I have no opinion whether that piece is safe to rappel on.
And there I thought your oops was AWESOME, concise humor... :haha:
Tom :moses:
:wink:...a log book for the Tech Cord! Opportunity used it for landing on Mars, maybe after a few uses we can donate it to NASA as a tax deduction. Assuming it doesn't break on use number 10...Quote:
Originally Posted by ratagonia
Just curious, what problems were caused by added rope weight?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer
More gear and weight is sometimes a bad idea. Fatigue. Reduced mobility. Trachyotomy Canyon. Stemming high for a long period of time and not fully realizing that your heavy pack (double rope) continues to help drop you down a few inches every few feet into a V. Then subtly you're stuck so tight you can't climb out.