So a world economic forum that they will happen to discuss the effects of climate change on the global economy, among a shit load of other topics? Meh, I don't really see the hypocrisy here.Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
Printable View
So a world economic forum that they will happen to discuss the effects of climate change on the global economy, among a shit load of other topics? Meh, I don't really see the hypocrisy here.Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
And I would be shocked if you did.......Quote:
Originally Posted by uintafly
Some used to stand around with a sign that said "The end is nigh". Mostly they were ignored and considered sad or pathetic. Now every time a big storm hits, some are insisting that it's Mother Nature striking back and we need to buy their products and ideology. Some are hooking up with that shit, some aren't.
There's absolutely no doubt humans are having a dramatic effect on the planet. We've been tearing it up real good for the last 300 years, especially. How will they control the population? Migration, Immigration, preserving resources? Slowing down all the concrete and asphalt? Moving billions who have little money into high tech "clean" machines? Good friggin' luck...
Maybe time will iron these things out all by themselves. The world 100 years from now may be a whole lot better overall than now...despite all those that say it's inevitable to go down the shitter.
The Global Warming Panic Carnival Barkers are just like that. Standing there in the village holding up that sign.
I recently read about some pretty amazing technology coming down the pipe that will equal the death of fossil fuels forever. Unlimited clean energy. It's right around the corner. Things will look drastically improved in the future. I honestly believe that.
Overpopulation? I dunno, the birth rate in the U.S. and Europe is lower than the population recharge rate. That means slow to static growth...think of the economy under Obama...that's how fast the population is growing in the industrialized nations right now.
https://www.ksl.com/article/46465386...ion-study-says
3rd World populations are a totally different story...
That's the big rub. Look at Mexico and these Central American countries.Quote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
Did you see the story of that gas pipeline that blew up the other day? Killed 100 people. These idiots haven't got the common sense to run AWAY from a 50 ft. gasoline geyser. Half the friggin' village came out with jerry cans and buckets. Crazy!
Three billion dollars a year of stolen gas is being pilfered in Mexico by gangs. If the shit starts getting real just south of the border, we're going to have problems. The possibility of millions on the move.
I love to be optimistic, but corruption is the real ball and chain.
....
.....
....,.
Four climate scientists destroy the anthropogenic global warming <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; background-color: rgb(229, 207, 163);">https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...;v=mqejXs7XgsU
but--but--but--The "science" was settled :ne_nau:
The sad part about this Global Warming fight is it reminds my of the government vs tobacco wars of the early 70's when both sides knew the facts yet continued to lie their ass off for monetary gains.
"destroy" is an amusing term folks in the heartland institute's disinformation bubble would use.Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
i remember many years ago sombeech touting a "pause" in the rise of the annual global average temperature and i asked what if it continues to rise?
here is through 2017 ...
Attachment 91743
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs...l-temperature/
Well--I'd likely go sombeech being as viable climate scientist as anybody..
So--what is it that the "scientist" above state that is not true?
Or--are they just the radical right scientist?
and you and alore are the radical left scientist.
Which means science can be manipulated.
Which means science has an agenda.
which would stand to reason that you can only trust science, if it's your guy managing the statistics--got it...:roflol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by stefan
So--In the history of our spaceball(earth), your going with 140 years of questionable data to form the basis of your opinion? Got it...:2thumbs:
Hell I don't even remember most of the tens of thousands of things I've posted, but I guess once in a while they are remembered years later by some.Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
those radical grey haired guys in the video, use 4.65 BILLION years for data.
stephen is proving them wrong with 140 years
climate science:roflol:
Guys -- one of the top climate scientists has already revealed that the Earth is going to end in 12 years because of global warming anyways. May as well just quit your job, cash out your retirement accounts, and move to Puerto Rico. The END IS NIGH!!!
https://s3media.247sports.com/Upload...86/8986420.PNG
proof of a new ice age--well at least as good of proof as 140 years of doctored charts
..../,
...,,,..,
//.,,.
,,,,,
...,
Scientists want to help save the Earth by storing carbon dioxide in the ground
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ge/2589582002/
Yup...carbon sequestration. It's a concept that's been around for a while. I think it's actually being done in some parts of the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by accadacca
My question is...
For the sake of argument, let's assume that global warming is all man's fault (a notion I disagree with). So what's the end game? What supposed action will save the world from ending in 12 years (as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claims).
I think at this point there's no way to stop global warming. This is a cycle that has been set into motion ever since the industrial revolution. I'm not convinced that electric cars and windmills are going to undo all of that.
I think at this point we would be better off adapting for a warmer future than trying to invent some fail safe to maintain the status quo.
Change my mind...
That would make sense thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
The problem with the current global warming scare is they are using such a small slice of time to make their point.
Just 56 million years ago, which is the blink of an eye in earth's history, the earth was much warmer then it is today.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...c12e2aec83.jpg
Why does this global warming argument sound so familiar?!?
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...0aa4d47347.jpg
Because people have been making money preaching this bullshit for a long time. The Jimmy Swaggarts of Mother Nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
You know what the world oldest profession is, right? The second oldest profession?...the pimp.
I have an almost identical article from some liberal fishwrap that I saved over a decade ago. It was preaching doom and utter ruin of civilized society by the year 2020 unless we stopped global warming. I was saving it so I could bust it out next year and I could call Bullshit...yet again. Maybe I'll go find it and post it up 9 months early.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
I really like Louder with Crowder. He did a segment on Global Warming I mean Climate Change:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwviDPo4Rh4
Mother Nature is the whore, the "Anthropogenic Climate Change Scientist" is the pimp and those that buy into the nonsense are the Johns.
There are folks out there that worship rocks, too.
I think Crowder spends too much time on bogley:haha:
Yeah, the guy's making too much sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo_stevo
He can be annoying sometimes with his constant cutaways and overdramatic style, and you have to take what he says with a grain of salt sometimes but much of what he says makes a lot of sense and really resonates with me because I am a natural born skeptic.
I question almost everything, and I really distrust anything that can be influenced by money or power -- and the Global Warming I mean Climate Change argument that is very much driven by both. I can go out on the internets right now and find a dozen reputed, respectable "scientists" who claim that Global Warming I mean Climate Change is legit -- and an equal amount who claim otherwise.
How much money did Al Gore make from his "Inconvenient Truth?" -- A turd of a movie that has been proven false now in so many ways.
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
Well--this don't fit the agenda at all
Amidst Global Warming Hysteria, NASA Scientists Expect Global Cooling
“We see a cooling trend,” said Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center. “High above Earth’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy. If current trends continue, it could soon set a Space Age record for cold.”
The new NASA findings are in line with studies released byUC-San DiegoandNorthumbria Universityin Great Britain last year, both of which predict a Grand Solar Minimum in coming decades due to low sunspot activity. Both studies predicted sun activity similar to theMaunder Minimumof the mid-17th to early 18th centuries, which coincided to a time known as the Little Ice Age, during which temperatures were much lower than those of today.https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...w-sun-activity
amazing how the chicken littles have so much high dollar education but lack the ability to be smart..
Money can't buy that.
Wait. Are you really trying to say that the sun putting out more heat makes it warmer here? Then when the sun is less active and putting out a little less heat makes it cooler here?
Hold on here....you're obviously just not as smart as you think you are....never mind. I got nothing.
Who knew, huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by twotimer