Printable View
Republicans will skip hearings and just move forward with his confirmation if she refuses to testify. Which we all know is what will happen in the end as her story is riddled with holes.
Grassley suggests last-minute Kavanaugh hearing could be canceled if accuser doesn’t accept invite
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...pt-invite.html
I thought Kavanaugh was a sure thing but his boat is definitely taking on water. Mark Judge, the alleged accomplice and Kavanaugh's close high school friend, appears unwilling to testify under oath. Who wants to perjure themselves? This guy wrote memoirs that go into detail about the types of party's the alleged victim described and about less than honorable debauchery. "Wasted" isn't exactly a book you want referenced at your Senate hearing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
Things are getting ugly. The RNC could lose alot of moderate voters and women for the midterms if they keep handling this so poorly.
I'm guessing Kavanaugh is now regretting saying "what happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep. That’s been a good thing for all of us" back in 2015.
I still think Kavanaugh is a done deal.... this is just the democrats version of Clarence Thomas 2.0...
...but if not...
Democrats better be careful of what they wish for or they stand a good chance of ending up with an even more conservative judge than Kavanaugh... Amy Barrett will probably get the job if Kavanaugh is scuttled...
Anyhoo... the next week is sure to be filled with lots of drama from the mainstream media...
Climb-Utah.com
Couldn't resist....... :ne_nau:
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...75&oe=5C263205
And I don't regret the fact, that made me smile..
Kavanaugh's accuser just bailed out the side door exit.... Kavanaugh's confirmation should be back on track by next Wednesday unless the Democrats figure out a way to conjures up more smoke and mirrors...
Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford demands 'full investigation' by FBI before testifying, in letter from her lawyers
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...r-lawyers.html
Climb-Utah.com
Dems put just enough doubt in the borderline Repubs that it may take a bit of time to convince Flake, Murkowski, and Collins... without them they don't have the votes.
But.. if a 3 and a half decade old sexual assualt claim means that much to all of them I think it's time for the whole group of Bill Clinton assaultees to get back on theband wagon - and take down HRC for being and active participant in their defamation.
The borderline Republicans are all indicating they will vote for Kavanaugh if she doesn't testify.Quote:
Originally Posted by double moo
Flake in particular said he just wanted to give her the opportunity to tell her story and if she doesn't testify he'll vote to confirm.
Climb-Utah.com
Collins said if she didn't show up Monday, she would vote to confirm as well.
This whole story is rapidly blowing up.
Now swinestain says she doesn't know if any of it is true.
Another Spartacus moment
“Telling one’s own personal story is often the most powerful way to make a point, or, more importantly, to make people think,” Booker wrote in the February 19, 1992 column for the Stanford Daily, under the headline “So Much for Stealing Second.”
“When grandiose statements entrenched in politically correct terminology are made, many may listen but few will hear,” Booker continued. “When I hesitated in writing this column, I realized I was basking in hypocrisy. So instead I chose to write and risk.”
“New Year’s Eve 1984,” Booker recalled. “I will never forget. I was 15. As the ball dropped, I leaned over to hug a friend and she met me instead with an overwhelming kiss.”
Things apparently moved very quickly for the young man, who recalled thinking of sex as a “game.”
“As we fumbled upon the bed, I remember debating my next ‘move’ as if it were a chess game. With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast. After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark,’” Booker wrote.
https://dailycaller.com/2013/08/11/i...-she-resisted/
./,.
Even taking the facts as alleged, this was a drunk 15 year old, and a drunk 17 year old at a party. There was no rape, her clothes didn't come off, there was no touching of her genitals, etc.. There is no evidence of physical harm at all. I think a lot of people would be hesitant at holding that against a 17 year old for the rest of his life. And that's if it was true.
So the dems want to die on the teenagers shouldn't be teenagers hill, along with sooo many other falsities.
/..,
..,
....
,,,.,
GOP view on sexual assault:
"She was drunk, it was her fault she was raped"
"He was drunk, it wasn't his fault"
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
^^^ Hell, what horny 17 year old didn't do all of the stuff listed above? It's called "Truth or Dare," and every kid I knew growing up played the game at least a half dozen times throughout grades 7 - 12.
What's next? Are they gonna dredge up "Toilet Papering" and "Doorbell Ditching" incidents too? :roll:
First off, by all accounts, including Ford's... she was NOT raped.Quote:
Originally Posted by uintafly
If Ford's account is true a 17 y/o boy grabbed some boob over the top of her clothing.