Good.. Keep her (in California) where she can continue to screw up that State. I'm positive that she and Pelosi are lesbian lovers! :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Holden
Printable View
Good.. Keep her (in California) where she can continue to screw up that State. I'm positive that she and Pelosi are lesbian lovers! :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Holden
I word to that..............Quote:
Originally Posted by BruteForce
:spankme:HOT!:giveit:
Heres another democrat from the house explaining why she banned barrel shrouds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...;v=9rGpykAX1fo
A well written article on "assault weapons" ban:
The writer is a democrat and a gun owner, do not read if your a wordsmith as they are mentioned.
"As we have seen, the battles of gun control have been fought, won and lost with definitions. Categories are created, connotations ascribed with the stroke of a pen."
http://kontradictions.wordpress.com/...-ill-tell-you/
:roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
Sad that our elected representatives doesn't even know what it is they want to ban.
Attachment 62152
And yet their hell bent on writing laws to restrict gun ownership.
I know you read the article from the image you posted:haha:
It's actually a really good article and answers most of the questions Hank was asking on gun control a few pages back.Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
:popcorn:
Interesting.... what the American people really want... and not what the media says they want...
According to a Gallup poll conducted on Tuesday, Americans want better mental health care, more police in school and a reduction in violent media more than they want a weapons ban to prevent school shootings. A majority did not think a weapons ban would be very effective in stopping shootings.
To Stop Shootings, Americans Focus on Police, Mental Health
That graphic was funny, YO! :haha:Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
Good read. :2thumbs:Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
Well, I finally had the time to read this entire thread, good stuff. :2thumbs:
Now, for my 2 cents on Acca's question...the term "Assault Weapon" pisses me off to no end. Let's face it, every single gun we shoot today, including muzzle loaders, shotguns, lever actions, bolt actions, single action revolvers, double action revolvers, semi-auto handguns and rifles, etc, etc, etc were at one time the latest technology and weapons of war. And since they were all used on the battlefield, they must all be classified as assault weapons.
A gun is a gun. Plain and simple. Just because one looks different or one loads faster or one is pretty and one is ugly makes no difference. They all do the exact same thing.
The media loves to use the term because it has a negative (evil?) sound to it, just like them using the term "automatic weapon" to describe a semi-auto. Sensationalizing is the name of the game. The media infuriates me too.
On a positive note...it is wonderful to see all the passionate law abiding gun aficionados standing up and letting their voices be heard. :nod: Keep up the good work.
I just hope my job isn't the person who has to come take somebodies gun away from them
Hahaha.... you're welcome to come and try confincating my guns any time you want.... but I'll warn you right now.... you had better bring a sack lunch because its going to be a long day :-)
Sent using Tapatalk
8000 a day are joining the NRA.
I'm looking forward to their press conferance tomorrow, which will be today in a few minutes.
Sent using Tapatalk
I've talked with several who are in law enforcement here in Southern Utah, including a police chief. Without hesitation, they all say there is no way in hell they would even consider this an option and ALL have stated they also have black rifles they would plan on keeping. Although law enforcement might have an easier route for keeping black guns, still no one willing to knock on doors to do such.Quote:
Originally Posted by 2065toyota
And since we all are now well versed on what an assault weapon is
The ironic thing is that if I ever was forced to flee my house I would take a handgun and one of my scoped rifles before my "assault" rifle. Maybe that's just me, but long range rifle would be more useful for protecting and hunting
Two views of how to protect children from maniacs. Which of the two would you prefer for your children?
Attachment 62160
Just finished watching the NRA Press Conference.
Nice to see someone stepping up with some ideas that have merit.
I loved how my President, Wayne LaPierre, blasted the media that were sitting in front of him. But of course, that will never make the news, just the freaks that tried to interrupt him.
Hahaha.... I posted the above while waiting for the NRA press conference to start.... nice to see great minds think alike ;-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
Sent using Tapatalk
In "A Zombie Survival Guide" an AR is one of the lowest ranked weapons!Quote:
Originally Posted by 2065toyota
He offered a plan that is to be implemented with NRA dollars.
That's substantially more than any politician can offer.
Ohh---except the ban barrel shrouds group, they have a plan:roll:
I am a little torn on this issue so can someone shed some light on the success of the Australian ban? Seems like it has worked but honestly IDK
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-12-1...xample/4431262Quote:
As the US once again struggles with the issue of gun control, the success of John Howard's 1996 laws banning semi-automatic weapons in Australia has been raised in the American debate.
The New York Times has referred to Australia's gun laws as a "road map" for the US, saying that "in the 18 years before the law, Australia suffered 13 mass shootings - but not one in the 14 years after the law took full effect."
As for NRA response I didnt watch it but did he say who would pay for an officer in every classroom? That would add millions and millions of dollars in salary+ benefits (I think this is the best idea but I dont want to hear ya'll whining about paying for it with taxes!) at a time most states are cutting back.
I know your not torn but I'll go there anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattandersao
First and foremost--you have to tell me HOW your going to confiscate 300million guns from citizens who have committed no crime.
Or--you could focus on how to make YOUR school a safer place. Put your energy where you see fit.....
Theres something you can do about one of these today....
After implementation, the NRA will PAY to train those with military and police backgrounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattandersao
These are volunteer positions...
The NRA currently has training available for police officers and are highly qualified for this task.
Finding law abiding volunteers will not be a problem.
Never a mention of an officer in every classroom.
The NRA also offered, above and beyond training officers, to help any school who wants it, to implement further security as needed.
-nothing more critical than our children's well being
-parents need to have confidence in their safety
-most up to date template for every school to tweak and tailor
-armed security will be A component - but not the only
-decisions on armed security made at the local level
-does not require any large outlays of money from state/local/federal
-not taking questions but starting Monday they'll be willing to have one on one conversations
This is a great example of where you might have wanted to watch it before you made such an assumption of the cost :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by mattandersao
Just one in every building. A lot of the secondary schools already have a police officer on duty here in Weber School District, so that is a good chunk taken care of. And then the Elementary schools have part time officers that service multiple schools.
He had an outstanding point in that we have armed guards for our:
- Banks
- Power Plants
- Federal Office Buildings
- State Buildings
- Sports Stadiums
- Concert Events
But everyday, so many of our children go to these "proud gun free zones" which I think is absolute bullshit.
Personally I would have made another proposal it would have went like this......
Since this country is DEEPLY divided at the 50/50 mark, we will be offering free help in regards to training and implementing further security measures to exactly 50% of US schools. We will hope that all schools remain safe while closely monitoring to see if there is any benefit that the 50% of schools enjoys. Further, after doing this study for 5 years, we suggest implementing whichever plan has worked the best at keeping students safe.
And in the interest of not forcing children from unwilling homes to participate, there will be a school in each community set up, we'll call these--liberal schools(gun free zones) and conservative schools(security personnel and school security systems upgraded).:lol8:
What school you want to teach in Matt?
I'm sure many will feel much more secure with the shoulder thing that goes up, ban crowd.:facepalm1:
What a positive difference they've already made
I saw this posted on USSC.
Very generous indeed.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Let our educators defend themselves and their students- Free classes to be offered
In the wake of the nation’s 16th school weapon incident since August. Clark Aposhian through FairWarning Firearm Training is re-affirming the offer of no-charge Utah concealed carry instruction to all public school employees. This now will also be available for staff and faculty of Utah Higher Education entities.Those interested may contact FairWarning at 801-560-4836 or by e-mail at Clark@fairwarning.bizFor those public schools employees who wish to be able to lawfully carry and defend themselves while at work A Utah concealed carry permit is required.Utah is one of only 2 states, which allow for those with a clean background to apply for and obtain a permit to discretely carry a firearm for self-defense within a public school.
FairWarning promotes the option of carrying discrete but accessible firearms for self-defense. We do not ever recommend engaging into a hostile environment or situation. However, the ability to carry a firearm may in fact mitigate such situations and will at the very least afford individual protection for the carriers themselves. If those carriers have control or responsibility over a classroom full of children that same protection will tend to encompass them as well.We strongly insist that the weapon be under the carriers control at all times, that it be maintained quietly and discreetly. We encourage an effective and consistent terrorist management plan be practiced within your schools.We have taught many public schools employees in the past 11 years. We recommend that if an employee is in their classroom or other securable location and becomes aware of a violent situation that they immediately close and lock their classroom door after gathering all adjacent students into the classroom. This will be their shelter in-place. If that employee has access to a firearm they should only engage the intruder if their classroom shelter is breeched.For those that think their children are safe in school and are far removed from the situations encouraging or allowing such attacks. With the current policies and procedures in place there is nothing to stop that same type of attacks from occurring here in Utah“We will never know if the presence of a firearm in an employee’s hands would have saved the life of students or staff at these schools. However we may state, with absolute certainly, how many people lost their lives when staff were not carrying a firearm for self-defense.” W. Clark Aposhian“The only reason to allow teachers to be armed is if we are committed to protecting our children.”http://utahshootingsports.com/
W. Clark AposhianSincerely,FOR QUESTIONS OR TO ARRANGE INTERVIEWS:
W. Clark Aposhian
Chairman - Utah CCW Review Board
Chairman - Utah Shooting Sports Council
Chairman - Utah Self-Defense Instructors’ Network
Member – Salt Lake County Gun Injury Prevention Board
Owner - FairWarning Firearm Training Institute
Contact Clark Aposhian, FairWarning at 801-560-4836 or by e-mail at Clark@fairwarning.biz
Not sure about other districts, but I was told that in the Alpine School District, you have the right to carry concealed, but if you choose exercise your right, you will be fired immediately...
Sorry, I didnt mean classroom I meant a police officer in every school but the question remains how will this be paid for salary+benefits adds up. I would guess that many states do not currently have a resource officer in their school.
In Utah this program thankfully already exists in many schools, and districts. I think you would have to do full time at elementary schools from now on after the latest shooting.
So they are Law Enforcement Volunteers, or just trained volunteers as there is a difference! If it is just some random volunteer I see that being a problem.Quote:
These are volunteer positions...
I dont think this would be feasible. Building the new schools in the liberal zone, hiring new principals and teachers and paying their salary/benefits for the liberal zone, heating and cooling the new schools, etc. I see this adding lots of new demand on a stressed out system. :bootyshake:Quote:
And in the interest of not forcing children from unwilling homes to participate, there will be a school in each community set up, we'll call these--liberal schools(gun free zones) and conservative schools(security personnel and school security systems upgraded).:lol8:
Once again who is going to pay for this? Are these state employees? Are you going to give them retirement? etc?Quote:
He had an outstanding point in that we have armed guards for our:
- Banks
- Power Plants
- Federal Office Buildings
- State Buildings
- Sports Stadiums
- Concert Events
You dont know me and I dont appreciate the characterization. Other than environmental topics I am quite libertarian. A little background on myself. My grandpa was a huge hunter, veteran, etc. He took me coyote shooting, bunny shooting, etc...been around guns most of my life, I dont own a gun because I realize my own inadequacies (I lose things, am a klutz and would end up in an accidental shooting sometime if I owned a gun). Some day I would like to own a rifle (mostly for the Zombiepocolype). Where I am torn is on owning basically anything more than say a rifle, shotgun etc....Some comments in this thread have been pretty thought provoking (modern rifles were cutting edge technology/military weapons at one time or another for example)Quote:
know your not torn but I'll go there anyway.
As for Australia the reason it wouldnt work in the USA is because it involved a confiscation (actually a buy back I believe and I understand a forced buy back is probably considered a confiscation) of firearms? Am I correct?
I know there are three types of lies (lies, damned lies, statistics) but it seems as if this has worked for Australia, at least in preventing mass shootings. Am I wrong?Quote:
"in the 18 years before the law, Australia suffered 13 mass shootings - but not one in the 14 years after the law took full effect."
EDIT-
I meant to add I see a trained Law Enforcement Officer in every school to be the best solution. I think that having several teachers with concealed firearms could be even better if they were extremely well trained, and I dont just mean at the firing range trained, I mean they are trained to deal with a school shooter, with guns going off around them, smoke in the air, frantic kids running style.... but unless we could ensure they had as much mandatory training as a cop I dont think they should be carrying.
Hang on....
Working on your Australia Problem
Heres a Chart from the Australian Gov.
While it shows no statistic on mass murder, it does include records from the time they instituted a gun ban(that actually wasn't a ban)
In the time since the ban--Homocide has indeed decreased by 27%(+/-)
Assault has risen 67%
Sexual Assault has risen 82%
Robbery has gone down--11% (apparently nobody falls for the ol' finger in the pocket anymore):mrgreen:
Kidnapping and abductions have gone up--79%
lots of conclusions can be drawn, I have mine, I'll let you decide on yours.
Above the Australian chart, is one from Switzerland, where most males possess firearms, due in fact to a military requirement.
They keep these firearms and more, their entire life. Military automatic rifles owned by those serving, are made SEMI-AUTOMATIC after retirement and returned.
So you could conclude, Switzerland is heavily armed.
Us population--311,591,917ish
Year Total Convictions Homicide
(Art. 111,112,113,116 StGB)Serious Bodily Injury
(Art. 122 StGB)Minor Bodily Injury
(Art. 123 StGB)Sexual Contact with Children
(Art. 187 StGB)Rape
(Art. 190 StGB)Theft
(Art. 139 StGB)Robbery
(Art. 140 StGB)Receiving Stolen Goods
(Art. 160 StGB)Embezzlement
(Art. 138 StGB)Fraud
(Art. 146 StGB)Narcotics Possession Major Violation of Traffic Laws
(Art. 90 SVG)Drunk Driving
(Art. 91 Abs. 1 Satz 2 SVG)2005 85,605 93 94 2,459 413 109 6,557 489 1,262 910 1,484 2,846 22,163 15,776 2006 90,592 95 105 2,523 382 131 6,569 553 1,196 880 1,521 2,616 21,599 18,439 2007 84,665 93 88 2,248 380 135 5,979 522 922 807 1,607 2,462 21,431 17,355 2008 93,024 95 133 2,635 415 133 6,345 522 905 848 1,665 2,606 25,339 17,836 2009 94,574 84 118 2,578 366 108 6,947 514 924 820 1,506 2,708 25,434 16,708
Australian Population--22,620,600
Swiss Population--7,907,000
So the Us population is around 14X larger than Australia
Australian Population App. 2.7X larger than Australia.
So, while it's easy and convenient to pick out one form of crime and try to make a point, it can be very misleading.
If you multiply any of the Swiss crime statistics by 2.7, none will come close to approaching the Australian numbers.
Therefore, if you want an answer to what really reduces crime, I suggest the model from Switzerland might be better than Australia's.
If you want to do a little reasearch I believe you will discover Australia's gun ban is seen as a monomental failure. If you are really interested in what happened in OZ you can start hereQuote:
Originally Posted by mattandersao
http://www.calnews.com/archives/metcalf13.htm
I'm not saying it's the best article out there, its just a place to start so you will have an understanding of what has happened. Much of the info in the article was provided by Inspector John McCoomb, Queensland's foremost police weapons expert.
http://i.imgur.com/p8IWx.jpg
An armed volunteer?
Thanks... comparison of Australia and Switzerland interesting...still on mass killings it looks like what Australia did has worked to stop them correct? Maybe they have just had 14 lucky years idk...