You talking 40rd + mags??(high capacity)Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian in SLC
Standard mags are 30rds, just curious.
Printable View
You talking 40rd + mags??(high capacity)Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian in SLC
Standard mags are 30rds, just curious.
Standard used to be 20 rnds...
Yeah, someone just sold two per that site Ice listed at 165, and a 40 rounder for 80. Wow.
Seems like the rifle with mags going for 12 to 1500. Although some at 900. Didn't realize Ruger retails them for around 900.
Colt LE6920 for 2200. Yikes!
I've been amused just browsing the gun auctions and watching the crazines.
Tap'n on my Galaxy G3
I don't have a list but many new ar's come with 30's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian in SLC
Mine came with 2-20's.
Some of those dang FFL dudes started removing 1 of the 2 30rd mags when they became so pricy.
And how bout' say anything joe:roll:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...re-questioned/
I feel like crazy people are gonna find a way to do crazy things no matter what the rules are. Personally, i want to be able to protect my family if they are in danger. So freedom to arm yourself in my opinion.
Found some, Colt Magpul Versions came standard with 30'sQuote:
Originally Posted by Brian in SLC
http://www.impactguns.com/colt-sport...289019356.aspx
It seems feinstein is a bit racist
And Y'alls thought Obama didn't have a job stimulus program...Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
:moses:
Yeah, the Mini 14 was standard with the 5 round mag's back in the 80's or so, and the 20 rounders were hard to get. They opened up the 30 for civilian sales for a couple years but they've been discontinued now, rumor has. They used to be just available to LE or Military folk is all. Ruger factory mag's always way more spendy than brand X. Even more so now.Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
Is it good for the democrats to be eating their own?
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...wtown-massacre
LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by ratagonia
Tap'n on my Galaxy G3
Read down through the comments, interesting.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...-comments.html
Point being?Quote:
Originally Posted by accadacca
It's a funny image.Quote:
Originally Posted by hank moon
The point for whomever made it? Making registration a requirement won't solve the problem.
problem being?Quote:
Originally Posted by accadacca
That is, I'd like to hear your version of "the problem" that is addressed by this sign. Seems like folks are going straight for solution w/o even agreeing on what the problem is.
You're the only one having a problem here. You add ZERO to the conversation and then demand others, who have the balls to be vested in the argument, offer their "version"Quote:
Originally Posted by hank moon
Get intellectually into the conversation or go away, your trolling skills are lacking.
The problem is criminals are not being prosecuted for crimes they commit. The problem is current gun laws already on the books, many of which address the concerns raised by gun control advocates, are not being enforced.Quote:
Originally Posted by hank moon
During a firearm task force meeting with Biden, NRA mentioned the need to vigorously prosecute existing gun laws. Biden responded, "We simply don't have the time or manpower to prosecute everybody who lies on a form, that checks a wrong box, that answers a question inaccurately." That's right: Biden said the administration doesn't have time to prosecute crimes under existing laws, but is proposing a host of sweeping new laws!
Or at least that is my take.... what's yours?