Here is another oldie but goodie....
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...e6d4252516.jpg
Printable View
Here is another oldie but goodie....
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...e6d4252516.jpg
Amy_Coney_Barrett
Looks like the job is Barrett's if she wants it. If they riot, it's against a female christian...that'll look nice.
Yup... and from the smoke signals being sent it also appears McConnell thinks he has the votes needed to make it happen.
7 kids, 2 adopted from Haiti, 1 special needs.
They attack her how?
These potential lines:
-Feinstein's, Catholic extremist
-environmental, too many kids
-cult behavior, too many kids
-irresponsible mom to have 7 kids and be away so much
-can't know the struggles of LGBT and singles having so many kids
-right wing nut, too many kids is proof
Or since all of those won't go over well, the usual: pick certain rulings and say she's a right wing nut. Then play the Garland denial double standard angle and be content with a future court packing.
Just remember... if the Democrats had this opportunity they would stop at nothing to install the judge of their choice.
I often wish the GOP would play the game with the same 'ruthless'ness.
And on a positive note... the Scam-demic is now over.
Hell, I read the AZ senate race, being a special election, means the winner is sworn in before Jan. With the D likely to flip the seat, we'll be at 52-48. Have to hurry.
^^^This is still open for debate and not likely. If it does happen it still gives the GOP until November 30th.
This is just the liberal media grasping at straws because they know the GOP is full speed ahead.
Also... if the candidate is qualified I don't see Mittens voting NO. He might not like it, but I think he'll take a bite out of the turd sandwich in the end.
Genius Trump Nominates Joe Biden To Supreme Court Forcing Dems To Accuse Him Of Sexual Assault
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Trump has announced his pick for Supreme Court justice: Joe Biden. By nominating Biden, Trump has forced the Dems' hands, making them believe the sexual assault claims and allegations of inappropriate, creepy behavior against the former vice president.
The "4D chess" move forced Dems to immediately accuse Joe Biden of sexual assault and reverse their position on the current claims against him.
"We now believe Tara Reade," said a somber Kamala Harris, "and we will do everything in our power to destroy this man's life."
https://babylonbee.com/news/genius-t...-supreme-court
the gift of harry reid
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFile...pg-1599370.JPG
ahhh---oooooppsss
https://media.thedonald.win/post/LVMFQ9uU.png
Mitt Romney is about to make Benedict Arnold look like a team player
https://twitter.com/BuckSexton/profi...?size=original Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) September 19, 2020
Fast forwarding to 6:21. Did Pelosi have a small seizure, or was she reading off a teleprompter? Or both. Stephanopoulos smiled. Weird episodic slip. Add another log to her pyre.
https://youtu.be/VRxcfe1ijQ4?t=6m21s
Well it certainly appears that date didn't pass...aside from a bit of "He said, she said" this weekend and some snowflakes threatening to burn the building down they're going to proceed as planned.
The Dems better get used to it, because for the next four years Trump is going to be shoving everything they don't like down their throats...and they've got no one to blame but themselves.
Full speed ahead! Also I've noticed Collins, Romney and Murkowski have all said the nomination should wait until after the election, but none have stated they would automatically vote NO for a qualified judge. I think that's a loophole more than one senator will use before all is said and done.
Trump says he will name Supreme Court pick by Saturday, urges quick vote
https://www.ksl.com/article/50019646...ges-quick-vote
^^^ "Civil War" -- Ha! That's a laugh. They've been waging uncivil war in the streets of our cities for months, and now they want to talk about a "civil" war?
I say bring it on. A civil war would be a welcome change to the nonsense that has been going on in every big city in America since March.
Do they even know how to fight a war on civil terms?
So, who else here was was assaulted by Barrett 30 years ago? Just trying to get a feel for the list of people to line up for the dems to testify at the upcoming hearing.
Speaking of lynching, I'm old enough to remember that not more than 3 months ago, the Dems were all against it. Are they going to flip that stance....again? Is this one of those instances of the famous party 'flips'?
Trump already erased Obama's legacy... if he erases RBG's I'm good with that.
Food for thought.... Why it’s imperative a new SCJ is appointed.
Attachment 95419
New states and ending the filibuster. These have been the Dems' 2021 goals all along. Add now packing the court. This confirmation fight explodes that truth into the light.
One of my reasons for pessimism with all you peeps here is the hidden agenda wasn't being discussed in the mass media. And like it or not, the mass media still reaches and influences more than not.
But the hidden agenda will no longer be hidden. It will be more and more openly discussed. That can only help us.
YES!!
If the Dems can bend and break the rules to fit their agenda, they have to know that the Republicans will assert equal right to do the same. Turnabout is fair play.
Trump could load up the Supreme Court with 4 more conservative justices that would guarantee a Republican filibuster for at least a generation. (Although honestly I doubt he would do that).
My money is currently on Barbara Lagoa to be Trumps SCOTUS nominee.
In addition to being extremely qualified and a strong conservative, Lagoa is a Floridian whose parents fled Cuba. President Trump must win Florida on November 3rd. To win Florida, he needs the Latino vote there. Choosing Lagoa to fill the vacant seat is a strategic choice going into this election.
What do you think?
Barbara Lagoa
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/who...ourt-contender
hooo---wheee, these aged well:roflol:
https://twitter.com/ITGuy1959/status...77608487628802
Lindsey Graham is on Hannity and says he has the votes needed.
I believe this Democrat tissy-fit about SCOTUS is only going to blow up in their faces. The average American who pays even a little attention to politics can see that the Democrats are trying to subvert the system in a failed attempt to regain power. And the fact that they refuse to accept that Trump is following the rules that they themselves established in 2016 does not look good. It makes them look weak and desperate, and it's a huge turn off to anyone claiming to belong to their party.
It would bode better for them to accept the newest member of SCOTUS with grace and dignity instead of vowing "Civil War" in a blind rage. Geez they act like such crybabies all the time.