If Trump loses the popular by 5% or so and somehow squeaks in EVs? There will be nationwide insurrection of a civil war level, imo.
Printable View
If Trump loses the popular by 5% or so and somehow squeaks in EVs? There will be nationwide insurrection of a civil war level, imo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougrz
What do you mean by this? What does "nationwide insurrection" look like?
Haven't we seen insurrection in Seattle, Portland, and Kenosha already?
I saw this one and laughed:Quote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
"I am from Massachusetts also and outside the city I find that firewood for sale is in second place followed by Biden!!!!!"
We've seen it in some key cities. But I think it would spread to hundreds or thousands of cities. If Trump wins both the pop and EV, less so, and in those same type of locales you named. Uniquely a large loss in pop, narrow win in EV scenario. To them it would emphasize the "structural racism" yada yada of the Constitution and draw the revolutionaries out in force.Quote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
i dont get it ! president trump was not that bad of a president ! why do people not love him ?
hmmm-is this in regards to Trump declassifying the russia hoax?
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFile...pe-1624239.JPG
Trump authorizes declassification of all Russia collusion, Hillary Clinton email probe documents
The president’s tweets come after Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe declassified documents that revealed former CIA Director John Brennan briefed former President Obama on Hillary Clinton’s purported “plan” to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server” ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-authorizes-declassification-of-all-russia-collusion-hillary-clinton-email-probe-documents
You guys will let me know if "the chair is against the wall"?:mrgreen:
Message to Intel: ‘This is Over, Hand Over All the Evidence of Russia Hoax NOW’
Rep. Kevin McCarthy noted what a colossal waste of time the “Russia” investigation has been, focusing on a fake story when we’ve been trying for so long to get the real story. He said that when the letter from Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe to Sen. Lindsay Graham was released, leaders of Congress wanted to have a meeting about it right away. Seems in all this time no one in either the House or Senate had seen this information. “This should drive every member of Congress,” he said, “to go get the underlying information that John Ratcliffe has just made transparent to the world.”
Looking back now, the timeline of events is just tragic. In July of 2016, key people are briefed that Russian intelligence has picked up that Hillary’s campaign was creating a false narrative about Trump “colluding” with Russia to take attention off Hillary’s email scandal. Then-CIA Director John Brennan personally briefs President Obama and others of this on July 26. “Crossfire Hurricane” is conveniently (for Hillary) opened just a few days later, on July 31. When former FBI Director James Comey is asked about this briefing last Wednesday, he says it “Doesn’t ring a bell.”
We know this is a lie. Investigating a major presidential candidate for being an agent of Russia is a huge deal, the details of which are not something that would simply escape one’s memory … unless perhaps we’re talking about Joe Biden’s memory.
McCarthy calls this “the biggest news that didn’t get reported.” True, last week was a big week for news, but there was plenty of time before the report that Trump had tested positive for COVID-19 to get it out there.
https://stream.org/message-to-intel-...ssia-hoax-now/
Why didn't this release of declassified documents happen sooner?
Considering the election is less than a month away this tactic kind of smells of desperation. Not to mention the media is gonna under-report the hell out of it.
I believe this is his response to barr, doing nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
Waited as long as possible until it became obvious barr was not going to do anything prior to election.
barr's ties are deeper than Trump and justice.
Exactly. The episode was the final piece of evidence proving the inherent rottenness of this country.Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
Might not be Barr. Might be Durham dragging.Quote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
It's not desperation to uncover the truth about the greatest coup-level hoax ever perpetrated in this country. But it's going to seem like it.
Who does Durham answer too?Quote:
Originally Posted by dougrz
I hear what you're saying. But if Durham refuses to release before the election and Barr forces it, Durham could single handedly discredit the entire investigation by saying it was forced.Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
This might be a way around Durham's dragging without discrediting what could be a good report.
I don't know, could be either, and either is bad. The sad reality is it doesn't matter. Trump is on track to lose handily and this entire matter ends in January.
The forces of the left and deep state proved too powerful. The American Experiment is over if the Senate falls as well. And Barr's seeming gung ho on taking down the deep state might have been a ruse all along to gain confidence from us.
I think barr is exactly that--A ruse, to bide our time until post election.Quote:
Originally Posted by dougrz
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougrz
Attachment 95499