https://external-content.duckduckgo....jpg&f=1&nofb=1
Printable View
"I know it's not good for me but I'm having mine with butter"
https://media3.giphy.com/media/tyqcJ...&rid=giphy.gif
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougrz
Ahh, The Epoch Times -- about the only objective news reporting agency left in the world. You know damn well MSNBC and/or CNN aren't gonna even dream of reporting this information. They're still too fixated on Giuliani's hair dye. :roll:
IMO, this "Smoking Gun" is definitely compelling -- but it isn't going to change anything. At this point everybody has pretty much quietly agreed that Biden won...he likely cheated...but he still won. The fakenews media will brush this aside as another desperate attempt by the Trump legal team to change the inevitable end result.
And I think the DNC knows damn well that cheating happened, but at this point they're defying anybody to prove it beyond a few affidavits.
^^^This^^^
I think this is in the hands of Tucker and Hannity, followed by Brit Hume, now. Yes, Fox.Quote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
This video is that powerful, and is the opening.
It takes one legislature to stand up. But the mere men in those shoes will have to risk their professional and political lives to act. Cover from Fox will make that possible.
Sad that action requires cover from the media. But it does. Truth itself is no longer sufficient.
The GA video is gaining traction.
Dershowitz commented on it tonight, saying it's compelling. Hannity tweeted about it and will hopefully headline it tonight. This isn't about proving in court, but getting state legs to act.
Hannity < Tucker < Brit, in terms of cover.
I'd feel a lot better if Trump would get a win in one of the important swing states to start the pendulum swinging in his direction...
GOP asks SCOTUS to block PA vote certification.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop...pa-votes-count
Tucker is covering on the next segment.
This is it. Last shot, imo. This video can't be clearer. Tied to a spike in time. Tied to observers being kicked out. Clear pulling of secret cases of ballots. Affidavits filed before the video confirmed.
Nothing more can be shown.
Momentum has to start tonight.
I think the SC has to suspend the Dec 8 and 14 deadlines. Otherwise not enough time anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
And GA is one of the important. GA, PA, and one of WI or MI. Plus it's the only one with now truly hard evidence of enough fraud votes to overturn the margin.
Legally, I think the NV case is strongest with the best data, and a judge who gave favorable rulings along the way.
34k margin. Eclipsed by ~90k flat out illegal votes. These aren't even signature disputes. They're just flat illegal votes.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...1d50566598.jpg
So apparently these people are all full of shit...confused liars one and all?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vjy3rCnmgE
More on this. PA is the clearest Constitutional case. Where the Const says a legislature can set the manner of selecting electors. Which means a governor can't order it and a court can't order it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
But I could also see the SC saying, "People voted in good faith, following what was at the time the lawful voting method. Therefore striking down such votes is an unfair punishment to them, with neither fault nor deception by the voter himself."
Where NV is obvious illegal votes. WI is obvious illegally registered people (case centers on people who registered solely on their ballot envelope). GA is videod machine stuffing. Etc.
MI and AZ don't have the clear legal cases as the others do, imo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sombeech
Sun Tzu's Art of War is the basis behind Trump's philosophy in the Art of the Deal... So Trump is very intimate with Sun Tzu's strategies....And that's what he's doing here.....
One of the core tenets in the Art of War is feigning weakness when you are strong, and strength where you are weak.... The classic Poker bluff essentially, and Trump is the master of the Poker bluff.
I'm mobile so I don't want to type a bunch of crap out, but for those of you thinking we know there's fraud but can't do anything about it you sirs are incorrect.
Kemp (Georgia) just finally agreed to a signature audit.
Things are moving forward exactly as planned. It's not the big flashing evidence event because those can be distracted with a mass shooting or elderly man driving a bus through the market crowd.
You are seeing the steady drip, drip, drip of evidence. How to boil a frog.
Big flashy moves too early in the game give the enemy time for a rebuttal. But the steady drip of evidence is indefensible.
Plenty of time still, all going to plan. Trump wins 2020. Just like they set out to do, and are following every step. This has been planned for years, exactly this.
Wait till you see how crazy the Dems get when they call for his removal from the Whitehouse.
And there, I ended up typing a bunch of crap anyways
Looks like a bunch of posts were lost?
The Dec 8 and 14 deadlines for legal disputes are obviously a death problem for that avenue. I've thought those aren't Constitutional, since the only date in the Const is Jan 20.
There is a legal opinion out agreeing with that. Alito set a deadline for PA to respond to his request of Dec. 9. Why did he do that? To kill the suit, or prove a point that Dec 8 isn't going to stand?
..
..
Yeah sorry, we had to roll the site back 2 days.Quote:
Originally Posted by dougrz
http://www.bogley.com/forum/showthread.php?p=633760
There's no way I'm reading all that. How about a couple of highlights?Quote:
Originally Posted by caverdan
..
I'm guessing the Alito move to push up the deadline means the SC will rule in favor of Trump.
Not sure it will affect enough ballots, but will be a boost to his side.
..
..
..
Good luck with that. I'll bet you still believe there is "no evidence of voter fraud" too.Quote:
Originally Posted by caverdan
You might want to switch your news sources. It kind of feels like I've said that before. Have I said that before?
SC ruling on PA likely tonight or tomorrow morning.
What I believe is Creepy Joe will become our 46th president on January 20th... everything else is just crumbs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sombeech
I hope I'm wrong... but I'm not...
Even more liberals that I talk with think he cheated but as long as he wins and doesn't get caught or there is enough evidence to change anything they don't really care. Win at all costs and at anyone's expenseQuote:
Originally Posted by Iceaxe
If you're not cheating you're not trying.
Indeed. The liberal clients I've had since the "election" have said the same thing, or they just shrug their shoulders.Quote:
Originally Posted by 2065toyota
What mystifies me most about all this is that they have no concern for who's actually going to be running the country...it's just "mystery people" when it boils down to it. At least we knew who Trump was. Now?...is it Gates? Bloomberg? Who writes the scripts for the media talking heads? What are their interests? What's important to them?
We've had a real good close look at just how fragile things can be this year...and we may have just handed the reigns of power to those that kickstarted the whole thing. To me it's just a giant shitshow of smoke and mirrors...unconcerned about the human debris in its wake.
Interesting and brilliant. Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the SC this morning. Suing GA, PA, MI, and WI for running unconstitutional elections.
SC has original jurisdiction in cases between states. Which means, the SC cannot punt by refusing to hear and letting a lower court ruling stand. These justices have to take a stand now.
Implication is, if the election setups are ruled unconstitutional, that doesn't take proof of fraud. It's a straightforward case of how the election laws were changed by governors and election departments rather than legislatures as required in the Const.
If the SC has the courage to apply the Const as written, this case wins. And a total civil war begins if they do. Cities aflame coast to coast. The left will scream that democracy has died, the Const and electoral college are enabling white supremacists, etc.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...lection-rules/
Schumer: Biden ‘Considering’ Forgiving $50,000 in Student Loan Debt via Executive Action
President-elect Joe Biden is “considering” forgiving $50,000 in federal student loan debt for low-income and middle class students, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said Monday.
Schumer held a press conference alongside Democratic Congressmen-elect Ritchie Torres, Mondaire Jones and Jamaal Bowman of New York, during which the group announced they have “come to the conclusion” that Biden can “forgive $50,000 of debt the first day he becomes president.”
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/...cutive-action/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecy9_kuJWAwQuote:
Originally Posted by dougrz
If the SC struck down the elections, there'd be 3 outcomes possible in my understanding.Quote:
Originally Posted by dougrz
1. Legislatures call new elections
2. Legislatures appoint a Trump slate
3. Legislatures appoint competing Trump and Biden slates and let the House decide it
#2 I don't see happening under any circumstance.
Red alert: Chinese boast of operatives 'inside America's core circle of power'
Tucker on it.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...61955845959680
China influenced American policies for decades through a covert network of “old friends” — sympathizers and agents — who had penetrated the highest levels of the U.S. government and financial institutions before the Trump administration, according to an academic linked to the Chinese government.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/dec/6/china-agents-us-government-helped-influence-policy/
The PA case that Ted Cruz said he was asked to argue before the SC is along the same lines as the Texas case. ie, invalidating based on the legislature not making election law changes.
If the SC rejects the PA first, safe to say they'll reject this TX suit as well. And probably the converse is true.
..