Printable View
As I have have watched guns and ammunition sale at record rates this past week I understood what was happening... these people are stock piling so they have the ability to defend the freedoms granted to them in the bill of rights. They are not going to surrender or compromise those rights without a fight.
Sent using Tapatalk
I've been surfing around looking specifically at liberal sites, reading the comments posted. Forget the freaks in the media, I want to know what real people think about this...
I'm surprised to see, even among the most liberal articles, the comments are mostly pro ownership. I'm trying to find someone with a reasonable reason to back their anti gun ideas....and I really can't find one. I really think there must be a psychological definition for fear of guns...like fear of the dark, or spiders, etc...I've always considered that these people who scream the loudest about this, have this affliction...they get physically ill at the sight of a gun.
Things like "Our schools shouldn't have guards because it will intimidate and distract the kids". What? It seems to me that it would "intimidate and distract" anyone bent on ill intent. C'mon...can't they do better than that?
It seems that we're all in agreement around here. I'd really love to hear some anti gun advocate really bring something with some meat on it...I can't find it. If anyone can post something they propose that makes one go "Hmmm..." then put it up and let's examine it.
Too bad all these knuckleheads give us is criticism about alien shoulder mounted cannons. Obviously, that woman actually believes those things exist! And she's a member of Congress...yikes.
Folks on the ends of the "gun" bellcurve will often have a fair amount ignorance about each other. Its an interesting thing. I'm a fairly liberal gun owner, and, have friends on the extreme ends of this debate. Some can't even have a rational discussion about it at all before it boils up into an emotional name calling deal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Byron
I think most of the folks I know who are very anti gun, will use this to further their cause. Yeah, they're hugely ignorant about firearms (heck, some even refer to "magazines" as "clips"...har har). They hate the gun culture and the embracement of violence and see adding more people with guns in schools as a really bad idea. I did get a kick out of the "put teachers in gun stores" response.
Brownells sells 3.5 years’ worth of magazines in 72 hours.
http://www.guns.com/2012/12/20/brown...s-in-36-hours/
Interesting article on what is happening in retale. Last Wednesday I tried to find some S&W magazines for some of the custom pistols my dad builds and sells. There were none to be had anywhere in the country. Brownell's is one of our usual suppliers.
Crazy stuff. Legislation should take months, and, even years, if the will for it is sustainable at all (and it may not be, given the timing of the election cycle). Law of supply and demand.
After the 1994 ban expired, there was a brief rush, and, after the last couple election cycles, a bit of a rush, then, the supply outstripped the demand. Prior to a couple weeks ago, there was a glut and the prices especially for an AR or mags, which were both plentiful, were at a fairly low level and you could get just about anything.
Be interesting to watch. Amazing economics in play for sure.
Some interesting stuff:
JG Shipping Info - Thursday December 20, 2012
We want to wish all of you a Merry Christmas. We hope you have a wonderful time with friends and family and are richly blessed this season.
Due to very high order volume we have sold out of many items. Additionally answers to your emails are several days behind, and you will have trouble getting through on the phone. If you placed an order please wait, shipping delays are currently a week or two. Please refrain from emailing or calling us to check if your order is proceeding. If there is a problem we will contact you. We are working through the orders and email questions as fast as we can. We will try to fill all orders that have been received, but certain items are oversold and many orders will be cancelled. We will notify you if your order is cancelled or the items sell out.
You will notice items being removed from our website as they sell out. They will be added again to the website when more become available. Please keep checking back to see availability of previously sold out items. We are unsure of how many of these items we will be able to restock, and prices to replenish from manufacturers and suppliers are starting to rise as demand increases prices. Thank you for your patience and understanding
Again we wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
Sincerely,
The JG Team
Cheaper than dirt = out of stock, out of stock, out of stock...
http://cdn1.cheaperthandirt.com/ctd_...-20RD-AL-G.jpg
2-MGASC223-20RD-AL-G
ASC AR-15 Magazine .223/5.56 20 Rounds Aluminum Gr...
$11.69
http://www.bogley.com/forum/images/p...ofStockBtn.jpg
http://cdn1.cheaperthandirt.com/ctd_...23-20RD-SS.jpg
2-MGASC223-20RD-SS
ASC AR-15 Magazine .223/5.56 20 Round Stainless Bl...
$14.63
http://www.bogley.com/forum/images/p...ofStockBtn.jpg
http://cdn1.cheaperthandirt.com/ctd_...-30RD-AL-G.jpg
2-MGASC223-30RD-AL-G
ASC AR-15 Magazine 5.56 NATO 30 Round Anti-Tilt ...
$12.43
http://www.bogley.com/forum/images/p...ofStockBtn.jpg
http://cdn1.cheaperthandirt.com/ctd_...23-30RD-SS.jpg
2-MGASC223-30RD-SS
ASC AR-15 Magazine .223/5.56 NATO 30 Round Stainle...
$15.03
http://www.bogley.com/forum/images/p...ofStockBtn.jpg
PK Firearms is suspending all online and telephone orders until Further Notice. We will update as we know more. It will definitely be after Christmas and most likely after the New Year. Please don't bother to call the Shop unless it pertains to an FFL License or Warranty Issues. Thanks for your business, and we appreciate your understanding. Merry Christmas
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
DUE TO A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN SALES VOLUME, WE HAVE BEEN FORCED TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND ONLINE ORDERS. ORDERS ALREADY PLACED MAY TAKE 5-8 DAYS TO PROCESS. MAGAZINE QUANTITIES ARE VERY LIMITED & PRICES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT ANY TIME!
Unfortunately there will be some orders that cannot be fulfilled due to inventory shortages. We Sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and are doing our best to fill all orders that we can. YOU MAY CALL 800-588-9500 TO PLACE AN ORDER. OUR PHONES HAVE BEEN OVERWHELMED AS WELL AND YOU MAY EXPERIENCE DELAYS IN GETTING THROUGH!
All employees are coming in early and staying late to process orders as fast as we can. CDNN Appreciates Your Patience and Continued Business!
And yet--even he who screams the loudest and willing to fund a ban, personally,STILL has no clue.:facepalm1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...;v=w8es6M_9HKk
I just got done cleaning and fully loading every gun and clip I have. Not really sure why, but mostly just because I can and wanted to. Also came to wonder if the Ruger 10/22's aren't the gun of choice?
So, when you are arguing for the reason to ban 30 rd magazines, maybe your argument might hold more weight if you held up a magazine and YOU weren't breaking the law!!!! 30 rd magazines are BANNED in Washington DC. The ban seems to be working well.
[COLOR=#333333][FONT=Arial]
I own a high powered pellet gun that has a side load plastic 12 load clip. Guess I better go bury that one also
What a fu**ing moron. Like I said earlier, I keep waiting for one of these people to say something reasonable...and they say WE'RE the ones with our heads in the clouds?Quote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
cnn is on it!!!!
looks like obama will go to any length to get his message out. Now it appears he has adopted biden
President Obama Sets January Deadline For Gun Proposals(CNN) -- The nation will have a set of recommendations to address widespread gun violence within weeks, President Obama announced Wednesday.
Vice President Joe Obama will lead an inter-agency group to come up with "concrete proposals no later than January -- proposals that I then intend to push without delay," the president said.
Washington D.C. police investigating whether NBC moderator violated lawQuote:
Originally Posted by oldno7
Posted by
CNN producer Larry LazoWashington (CNN) – Washington Metropolitan Police Department is investigating whether NBC’s David Gregory violated D.C. gun laws when he displayed what he described as a 30 round magazine as part of an interview during Sunday’s “Meet the Press.”
“So here’s a magazine for ammunition that carries 30 bullets. Now isn’t it possible that if we got rid of these, if we replaced them and said well, you can only have a magazine that carries five bullets or ten bullets, isn’t it just possible that we could reduce the carnage in a situation like Newtown?” show moderator Gregory asked Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association.
It’s not known whether the magazine Gregory had in his hand was authentic or a prop. D.C. police spokeswoman Gwen Crump told CNN the department is investigating the matter and would have no further comment at this time.
Possessing a large capacity ammunition device, such as a magazine, isillegal in the District of Columbia if the device holds more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The code also specifies the large devices are illegal regardless of whether or not they're attached to a firearm. Gregory showed the magazine Sunday without a firearm attached.
NBC’s studios, from which “Meet the Press” is broadcast, are located within city limits. The network did not respond to CNN’s requests for comment.
In the wake of the school shooting in Newtown, gun control advocates have been pushing for a limit on high capacity magazines. Such a restriction is one of the items President Barack Obama mentioned last week when he announced an administration effort to curb violence.
“I don’t believe that’s going to make one difference,” LaPierre told Gregory during the show.
Several conservative commentators first raised the issue of whether Gregory had broken D.C. law by using the magazine.
But if the guns are illegal the bad guys wont have them either so we'll all be happy
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2065toyota
:roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::r oflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::rof lol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflo l::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol: :roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::r oflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::rof lol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflo l::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol: :roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::r oflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::rof lol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflo l::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol: :roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::r oflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::rof lol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflo l::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol: :roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::r oflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::rof lol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflo l::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol: :roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::r oflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::rof lol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflo l::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol: :roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::r oflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::rof lol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol::roflo l:
Good one. I think that was the funniest thing I've seen on this forum all year....aside from that "Cat Hijack" thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don
If we as a society decide to ban these weapons ONCE AND FOR ALL because it is a good idea for the future, then 100 yrs from now (if we are still here), it will have had a positive effect. I think a lot of folks using the argument that gun control measures "won't do anything" are working from a short term view.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hank moon
Still seems like squinting at an ideal situation that is almost never going to happen.
Banning assault rifles in the U.S. -- OK, I'm on board. I can see how that could happen. Hell, I almost agree with it.
Banning assault rifles in every nation of the world -- IMPOSSIBLE.
How are you going to enforce your ban on North Korea, China, Israel, Russia, etc, etc, etc? Good luck with that.
Short term??Quote:
Originally Posted by hank moon
Ever hear of the Bill of Rights??
Went into affect in 1791!!
Seems it has worked rather well for 221years....
The Bill of Rights are Amendments to the Constitution, to protect the rights of the "people".
Would love to see your documentation showing the ban of any particular weapon will have a "positive effect"
Once again--I would be glad to attach links if you are un familiar with the Bill of Rights.
clarification: my post refers only to a U.S. ban.Quote:
Originally Posted by rockgremlin
Heres the 2nd Amendment:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.