trouble for President, more Russian collusion

[oldno7]

ex President

http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/

[oldno7]

After the Uranium One deal was approved, Uranium One’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton also appears to have benefited financially as he received $500,000 for a speech he gave in Moscow shortly after Rosatom made the announcement that they were taking control of Uranium One.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/22381/report-fbi-hid-evidence-tying-clintons-russian-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=restlesspatriot

[oldno7]

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration

[rockgremlin]

ex President

http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/


Doesn't fit the narrative. Should die on the vine in short order.

[Brian in SLC]

More fake "news"...see the title on the article. "Opinion". "Post Editorial Board":


OPINION (http://nypost.com/opinion/)EDITORIAL (http://nypost.com/tag/editorial/)


Team Obama’s stunning cover-up of Russian crimes (http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/)By Post Editorial Board

[oldno7]

More fake "news"...see the title on the article. "Opinion". "Post Editorial Board":


OPINION (http://nypost.com/opinion/)
EDITORIAL (http://nypost.com/tag/editorial/)


Team Obama’s stunning cover-up of Russian crimes (http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/)

By Post Editorial Board


or you could read the article by the "hill"
you should like them.

[Brian in SLC]

Got a kick out of this:

How reliable is the "New York Post" compared to other newspapers?






















11 Answers



https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-thumb-8520863-50-kjcigkzhupmvtleovzyiidfqwzvnqmes.jpeg (https://www.quora.com/profile/Barnard-Law-Collier)


Barnard Law Collier (https://www.quora.com/profile/Barnard-Law-Collier), Former New York Times correspondent, bureau chief, magazine editor, writer
Updated Jul 22 (https://www.quora.com/How-reliable-is-the-New-York-Post-compared-to-other-newspapers/answer/Barnard-Law-Collier)









A DOZEN USEFUL DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN THE NEW YORK POST
AND THE NEW YORK TIMES.
I read the New York Post from cover to cover nearly every morning at The Flame restaurant in New York City and I have, over the years, found ways to put the Post to its best uses:


The Post can truthfully boast an extremely reliable horoscope that is far more accurate and literate than 92% of the rest of the newspaper; the bridge column is goofy and only occasionally inaccurate. However, on Sundays, they shrink the type size to about 9 point, and it’s annoyingly hard to read. Compared to the New York Times: Post enjoys a slightly more humorous bridge column, and there is no horoscope in the Times.
If you have eaten something sickening unto nausea (you won’t find any such food at The Flame) then a sure cure is to read the Post’s editorials and most of the op-ed pieces, 85% of which will make a caring person vomit almost 90% of the time. (It is true, too, that although he valiantly tries, poor John Podhoretz’s scrivening is only 40% vomit-producing, and now and again, therapeutically funny. George Will’s cloudy-eyed pomposity is always too boring to bother with any longer.
Every part of the human female body, with the occasional exception of a few pubic hairs and nipples, are available for viewing every day in the Post. This is particularly true of the Family Kardashian, whose bloated corpuses in scanty (less than 5 square yards) attire appear in all-too-vivid photographs almost daily.
The Post’s sports section is OK and by far the best edited section of the paper. Its writers and reporters ritually leap upon and pummel any player who has a bad day; a bad week and the unlucky athlete has his or her manhood or womanhood questioned; a longer slump may mean nasty, bad-pun headlines. However, after a single good day, the same player may become an immortal hero. The Times, too, presents well edited sport pageson the weekends. Times SundaySports is worth pilfering from your neighbor’s doorstep.
Front page, right hand, top-of-the page Times stories are lucky to earn a single paragraph at the bottom of page 15 in the Post.
Even if you firmly believe Mayor Di Blasio is weak as water and an insult to the city you will feel pity and sympathy for him when you read how he is treated in the Post. When you read about the mayor in the Times, you merely yawn.
There is some woman (whose name God has mercifully allowed me to forget) whose initials are A.P. (not the news service), who eats cheap and smarmy for breakfast and washes it down with slimy and smelly, and that’s on a pretty good day. There is absolutely nobody on the Times editorial staff who could possibly rival her in brown-nosed sleaze. She is righteously proud of this distinction.
The front page headlines of the Times are like sex with almost all your clothes on. The Post’s front page headlines are like sex on the down-market side of the porn hubs. If you want to understand what that feels like, imagine being a prick with a surname like Weiner.
The Post fits fairly well on the smaller booth tables of The Flame and its tabloid size allows for easy page turning. In a narrow space, The Times demands acrobatics and a talent for origami to read, with many jumped stories that require page turning. The Post rarely jumps a story, or needs to.
In the Times, Hillary Clinton is treated with due respect and consideration, although not with true love. At the Post she is treated with pusillanimous loathing, as if she is not a woman but a wicked witch who terrifies the boobocracy. The Post had a closeted man crush on Donald Trump, and after the first 100 Days feels a mild nausea about it.
Neither paper has anyone writing for it whose work is reliably funny. Clever, yes. Funny, seldom. One wonders why not.
The Times is the clear winner when it comes to the ultimate utilitarian test of a newspaper ~ to kindle fires in a fireplace. The paper the Times is printed on burns hotter and faster than the cheaper, slightly spongier paper used by the Post. The Post burns best when ripped into shreds; the Times is best to roll into tubes and fold.

[oldno7]

Trumps on it

https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/921069691053006848/video/1