Sun Dance
01-08-2012, 09:03 PM
We're in the market for a 4-wheeler and I thought I'd solicit advice.
My wife and I will probably share it for a few years until we can get another. We're not heavy people - I'm tall and thin, she's short and petite. We don't do crazy stuff, but we like to get to nice places not accessible in a stock Jeep. We've ridden all the way to the top of Snake Creek to where it overlooks Brighton and didn't consider it a horribly difficult ride. We're looking to ride and see fun places with some technical trails, camp, and plow the driveway.
If it doesn't say Honda on the side I'm not really interested. Must be 4x4 and at least semi-auto transmission (and include Reverse). My mother-in-law has lent us her 2005 Rincon (with independent rear suspension) and we've enjoyed it. However, I'm not sure we need such a high-end model or an engine that big, and I've heard the Rincons have a wider turn radius than say, a Rancher. I'd really like a Rancher AT, because I like the extra-high clearance it has. But should I really be worried about 6.5 inches vs 9 inches of ground clearance on a 4-wheeler? Don't their relatively short wheelbases allow them to pretty much go over anything reasonable regardless of the ground clearance?
I'm curious about independent rear suspension vs the axle suspension. Does it really matter that much? I don't mind feeling a few bumps, as long as I can handle it for a few hours. They talk about power steering taking away even more of the shock, but I don't know. This is a 4-wheeler. We're going out to be in the rocks and elements. Do I really want a cush ride like that? What's the happy medium here?
Rear disc vs. drum brakes? Does this matter? Looks like most of the middle-end models have drums on the rear. I know I hate changing drum brakes, but I guess I could practice more. Is there an advantage to having rear discs?
Our budget is between $2500-3500. It's our first, so we don't have to have the best of the best, but we also don't want something that's going to cost a ton to keep running. I'll be keeping a particular eye out for body damage or other signs of rolling. I'm kind of looking for something with low mileage, but I realize that I may have to compromise on this. What mileage range would you say would be too high? These rentals that come out of St. George and are 2010 models with 8900 miles on them seem like dogs to stay away from. What I'm seeing in our budget right now, at least on KSL, tend to be 2004-2006 Rancher 4x4 models with anywhere from 900-5000 miles on them. Is this about right? Should we be looking elsewhere?
Thanks a ton in advance for your advice!
My wife and I will probably share it for a few years until we can get another. We're not heavy people - I'm tall and thin, she's short and petite. We don't do crazy stuff, but we like to get to nice places not accessible in a stock Jeep. We've ridden all the way to the top of Snake Creek to where it overlooks Brighton and didn't consider it a horribly difficult ride. We're looking to ride and see fun places with some technical trails, camp, and plow the driveway.
If it doesn't say Honda on the side I'm not really interested. Must be 4x4 and at least semi-auto transmission (and include Reverse). My mother-in-law has lent us her 2005 Rincon (with independent rear suspension) and we've enjoyed it. However, I'm not sure we need such a high-end model or an engine that big, and I've heard the Rincons have a wider turn radius than say, a Rancher. I'd really like a Rancher AT, because I like the extra-high clearance it has. But should I really be worried about 6.5 inches vs 9 inches of ground clearance on a 4-wheeler? Don't their relatively short wheelbases allow them to pretty much go over anything reasonable regardless of the ground clearance?
I'm curious about independent rear suspension vs the axle suspension. Does it really matter that much? I don't mind feeling a few bumps, as long as I can handle it for a few hours. They talk about power steering taking away even more of the shock, but I don't know. This is a 4-wheeler. We're going out to be in the rocks and elements. Do I really want a cush ride like that? What's the happy medium here?
Rear disc vs. drum brakes? Does this matter? Looks like most of the middle-end models have drums on the rear. I know I hate changing drum brakes, but I guess I could practice more. Is there an advantage to having rear discs?
Our budget is between $2500-3500. It's our first, so we don't have to have the best of the best, but we also don't want something that's going to cost a ton to keep running. I'll be keeping a particular eye out for body damage or other signs of rolling. I'm kind of looking for something with low mileage, but I realize that I may have to compromise on this. What mileage range would you say would be too high? These rentals that come out of St. George and are 2010 models with 8900 miles on them seem like dogs to stay away from. What I'm seeing in our budget right now, at least on KSL, tend to be 2004-2006 Rancher 4x4 models with anywhere from 900-5000 miles on them. Is this about right? Should we be looking elsewhere?
Thanks a ton in advance for your advice!