View Full Version : Trapping
chunick
12-14-2010, 03:05 PM
Hey just wondering what's everyones thoughts about trapping coyotes, coons, etc.?
denaliguide
12-14-2010, 03:50 PM
get after it.
ilanimaka
12-14-2010, 04:21 PM
I give it :2thumbs:. It's a necessary means of controlling the population of many animals. One of these days, I'd LOVE to get into it myself, just not quite yet. :nod:
It's a necessary means of controlling the population of many animals.
oh please explain
Do trappers pay vet bills for domestic dogs caught in traps?
chunick
12-14-2010, 04:56 PM
It plays a vital role in controling animals that are causing issues. Non native type animals that people release. You gotta learn how to control your dog, then they would not need the vet.
You gotta learn how to control your dog, then they would not need the vet.
:roll: This has been discussed before... http://www.bogley.com/forum/showthread.php?33127-Coyote-Trapping&highlight=traps
Udink
12-14-2010, 06:30 PM
Hey just wondering what's everyones thoughts about trapping coyotes, coons, etc.?
Only if they really deserve it. :fakelaugh:
Sombeech
12-14-2010, 08:53 PM
Where's Rev. Coyote at? :haha:
ilanimaka
12-14-2010, 10:55 PM
oh please explain
Do trappers pay vet bills for domestic dogs caught in traps?
There are 2 points here.
1) If a dog is in a location where it can get caught in a foothold trap, then it stands to reason that either the dog has a problem with running off, and therefore the owners have a problem controlling their dog, or that the dog is feral and needs to be destroyed anyways. Yes, I believe that all feral dogs & cats should be shot on sight. If the dog has an issue with running off, then being trapped may well cure its wanderlust & if the dog was lost then as an owner, I would prefer to get my dog back with a broken leg than not at all.
2) Of the trappers that I DO know, if any of them were to put their traps near an area where somebody's pets frequent, then they would pay for at least PART of the vet bill, depending on the circumstances. If I were the trapper (though I know better than to put the traps in such area), I know that I would as recompense for my carelessness.
Udink
12-15-2010, 07:47 AM
If a dog is in a location where it can get caught in a foothold trap, then it stands to reason that either the dog has a problem with running off, and therefore the owners have a problem controlling their dog, or that the dog is feral and needs to be destroyed anyways. Yes, I believe that all feral dogs & cats should be shot on sight. If the dog has an issue with running off, then being trapped may well cure its wanderlust & if the dog was lost then as an owner, I would prefer to get my dog back with a broken leg than not at all.
The truth is, some people are f*cking idiots. There are some irresponsible dog owners, and some irresponsible coyote trappers. If a trap is less than six feet from a dirt road, and only a few hundred feet from a paved road, in an area where people (and their dogs) recreate, would you still unreservedly defend the trapper? I'm not against trapping, but I would be in favor of some regulations that place some areas off-limits to trapping (similar to existing laws regulating discharge of a firearm within a certain distance of a road, building, etc.).
ilanimaka
12-15-2010, 09:04 AM
The truth is, some people are f*cking idiots. There are some irresponsible dog owners, and some irresponsible coyote trappers. If a trap is less than six feet from a dirt road, and only a few hundred feet from a paved road, in an area where people (and their dogs) recreate, would you still unreservedly defend the trapper? I'm not against trapping, but I would be in favor of some regulations that place some areas off-limits to trapping (similar to existing laws regulating discharge of a firearm within a certain distance of a road, building, etc.).
Udink, you & I would be in complete agreeance over the fact that stupid peple can be found everywhere. If a trapper is irresponsible with his traps, even if it's "technically" legal, then he/she needs to be tased. I also agree that the regs should be adjusted to minimize the possibility of overlapping trapping areas with stompin ground.
Brian in SLC
12-15-2010, 09:29 AM
Hey just wondering what's everyones thoughts about trapping coyotes, coons, etc.?
I think its barbaric.
Grew up in Montana, owned traps I got from a relative. One day, I couldn't find them. Years (many many years) later I found out mom tossed 'em out. Kinda funny in hindsite. I was pretty bummed at the time. As a younger feller, I'll admit some detached and morbid facination with watching a wild animal suffer. Then I grew up I suppose.
Pretty darn cruel to leg trap an animal. I kinda get the method of trapping beaver or muskrat where they are drowned and die fairly quickly. Or, a Havahart type trap that live traps a critter. But, not checking a trap for days and days...that's some serious suffering.
The domestic dog issue is tough, too. Who doesn't let a dog run off leash when they can? How would you even train a dog not to step in a trap designed to fool a wild animal? I'm not sure how you blame the dog or dog owner.
Kind of an issue here in the Wasatch foothills. Folks find dogs stuck in traps, along with critters that have long sufferred and died. Has made the news here a number of times. Some graphic stuff. Some very pissed off people.
I've seen and talked to folks setting traps (west desert out by Little Sahara). I respect what they're doing, even if I don't agree with it.
Saw a coyote last weekend, down south, east of Mesquite. Watched him for a few minutes. Really neat to see. The thought of that wild critter, stuck in a trap, for days, suffering. Just sounds so cruel and unnecessary to me.
This is in the news because they're thinking of extending the time required to check a trap from two to seven days? Yikes. I think two days is too long. Bullet is quicker if you need to dispatch a critter.
Geez, maybe I oughta go and hug a tree now...ha ha.
Cheers,
-Brian in SLC
Deathcricket
12-15-2010, 02:27 PM
Not for them. Seems to me like a lazy way to hunt, causes needless injuries to non designated targets, and is just all around bad. Heck, I almost stepped on one, half buried in leaves. Be a man and hunt with a gun.
trackrunner
12-15-2010, 04:42 PM
Be a man and hunt with a bow. Or better yet a knife and your bare hands.
fixed
how about...
climb a tree
wait
jump on the back of your prey
ride it back to camp
then slit is throat
now thats much more awesome then laying traps.
ilanimaka
12-15-2010, 06:53 PM
how about...
climb a tree
wait
jump on the back of your prey
ride it back to camp
then slit is throat
now thats much more awesome then laying traps.
Ya know, I tried that once. But in the end, it just called its lawyer & the whole thing got ugly from there. If I was allowed, I'd use land mines. Oh yeah... Just sit back & watch Wille E. come on by and BOOM!
Sorry... Feelin a little bit childish tonight. :twisted:
StudChild
12-15-2010, 07:11 PM
Ya know, I tried that once. But in the end, it just called its lawyer & the whole thing got ugly from there. If I was allowed, I'd use land mines. Oh yeah... Just sit back & watch Wille E. come on by and BOOM!
Sorry... Feelin a little bit childish tonight. :twisted:
I like it.
Trapping animals has been done, try trapping people, with men all it takes is something cold to drink, for women credit card works every time.:lol8:
MY T PIMP
12-16-2010, 02:58 PM
I don't know how many are following the mule deer situation in Utah. But, after a decade of extensive research the DWR is finally answering the question where have all the deer gone? For years it was assumed no water, winter kill, and depleting winter habitat has been the main reasoning behind dwindling deer herds in Utah. But apparently according to the extensive research conducted by wildlife biologists it has been concluded that massive predation is responsible and ( I'm not talking about the 10,000 or so deer taken by hunters every year). Due to the falling price of pelts and virtually no factor of natural selection Coyotes and Mountain Lions are populating out of control in Utah. It is estimated there are for more of these animals now in Utah then there were before the pioneers homesteaded the area. In 2012 Deer hunting will be conducted in a 29 unit draw system in Utah on top of that the DWR is going to dramatically increase the number of predator tags and construct additional programs to get predators under control. In doing this it is the DWR's goal to achieve growing deer populations.
Coyote trapping is one of these programs. The new proposed program will allow a trapper to check traps lines up to seven days instead of the current 48 hour law. I believe Mule Deer to be one of Utah's greatest biological and natural treasures. Unlike Mountain Lions and Coyotes who can virtually live in any wild eco-system, Mule deer have specific needs and requirements which can only be met in a handful of states. I can't imagine Africa with out the Zebra because people wanted to see the Lion more.
mattandersao
12-16-2010, 04:25 PM
I decided to look up the alleged decade long extensive research blaming predators for dwindling deer herds in Utah. Here is what I found
"Mule deer were common in Utah at the time of settlement, although not as abundant as today."
"Mule deer are adaptable to a wide variety of habitats throughout their range (Wallmo, 1981). In North America, they live from the northern boreal forests to the hot deserts of the southwest and from the coastal rain forests to the Great Plains. In Utah, mule deer are found in nearly all of the state although they are less abundant in the desert areas."
"Loss and degradation of habitat are thought to be the main reasons for mule deer populationdeclines over the last few decades...The quality of mule deer habitat is the major factor in determining herd size. Habitat quality for mule deer has declined in Utah over the past 40 years"
Predators are apparently the scapegoat rather than the cause
" Predators are often identified as one of the main causes for mule deer herd declines in Utah. However, predator-prey relationships are complex and not always easily understood. There are
often many factors which can negatively affect mule deer populations including predation. The
complex relationship between predators and habitat is described by Geist (1999). “Inevitably
predators are blamed for declining mule deer populations, in particular when the survival of
fawns is low. There is no doubt that today’s predators are effective in killing deer. However,
predation is not independent of poor habitat quality. Such translates itself less as a reduced birth rate, but as fawns born too small, too poorly developed and too weak to be viable. Here
predators take fawns that have a low chance of survival anyway. Improved habitat quality,
which leads to better growth and larger body size in deer, is also expected to lead to large,
vigorous fawns that are more difficult for predators to catch.”
UTAH DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MULE DEER. http://wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/biggame/pdf/mule_deer_plan.pdf
ilanimaka
12-16-2010, 04:44 PM
So what you're saying is that this text that you've copied from the Mule Deer Management plan (which by the way has no material dated sooner than 2008) IS the "alleged decade long extensive research." Sorry but you're gonna have to do better than that...
mattandersao
12-16-2010, 04:54 PM
So what you're saying is that this text that you've copied from the Mule Deer Management plan (which by the way has no material dated sooner than 2008) IS the "alleged decade long extensive research." Sorry but you're gonna have to do better than that...
"This plan was approved on December 4, 2008 and will be in effect for five years from this date" Thus the plan will be in effect until Dec 4, 2013.
I guess maybe my previous post was misunderstood. I read MY TPIMPS posting he didnt provide any source just the DWR decade long research. I questioned what he said and did some quick research. I found, and have no idea if what I found is the research he referred to, was theopposite of some of his claims.
1. Mule deer are not as unique as he made it sound.
2. He stated quite clearly that predators are the #1 cause of herd degredation which according to the current Mule Deer Managment plan is not true.
Maybe there is another DWR source saying different but...
ilanimaka
12-16-2010, 05:20 PM
While I do agree that sources are vital when having one of these lovely debates, I just wanted to make sure you weren't presenting a nickel & calling it a dime.
And for the record, so long as the back and forth stays cordial & away from name-calling, I'm very much enjoying this. :wink:
Brian in SLC
12-16-2010, 05:23 PM
Cite more recent research?
Its an interesting document. I moved here in '85 and couldn't believe the number of folks that went out on the deer hunt. Kinda turned me off to the whole thing, but, admittedly, I also got too busy and it was hard to find time. Was successful on a high country buck hunt, though, so, nice way to call 'er good (for now, at least).
My bet is a big hitter affecting deer herds is both loss and degradation of habitat (yeah, I know, parrotting that report). But, it makes sense. Wasn't that many years ago that there were gaps in urbania down the I-15 corridor. Now, its houses and strip malls.
The deer population charts show the big population dives tracking the drought years and the tough winters.
There's always been a boom and bust relationship between prey and predators. Cyclic. I guess stronger elk herds may not be helping.
Hunters and the "environment" have always been strange bedfellows. Makes sense of you take care of the habitat, the game will follow. But, folks don't want to hear that they can't ATV, hike, 4wd in areas that are critical to game. Or, that they need more open space instead of a new neighborhood or ten. Look at how much winter range has been lost. Crazy.
Rough math, here, but...300k deer in the state? 250k hunters want permits? They issue, what, 90k permits? Buck to doe ratio is what? Doesn't take too many years of hunting pressure, drought, tough winters, and, natural (and unnatural like cars!) predators to really hit he deer herds hard.
Its funny that the underlying debate on the trapping issue isn't really about trapping, per se. Its about the mule deer hunt. A hunt that is a huge part of Utah legacy. Makes it more of a political football than just the debate itself.
Rev. Coyote
12-17-2010, 02:36 PM
Well, Mister Beech, since you asked, I believe trapping to be ****ed up, cowardly, and trashy.
Merry Christmas!
canyoncaver
12-17-2010, 02:40 PM
Traps are just another coward's tool used by the small penis crowd. If you want to kill something, go shoot or stab it like a real man. Poisons and traps are for the weak.
It has been proven that coyote populations INCREASE under heavy "predator control." Coyote litters increase in number of pups when they are being hunted. 100 years of coyote "control" measures have resulted in an explosion in coyote population. They are nature's great adaptor. Probably second only to man in their ability to adapt to different habitats.
Coyotes are expanding in range and number because they are filling the ecological niche that was once held by the wolf. As wolves were eradicated across the landscape, the coyote moved in. This is why you see coyotes in places that they never lived historically, like downtown New York and Boston. I'm not suggesting that we all live next door to wolf packs, just that the abundance of coyotes has been created and abetted by human practices. In Yellowstone, since the re-introduction of the wolf in 1995, coyote numbers have collapsed. They are once again 2nd dog instead of top dog. In any ecosystem that the wolf has been extirpated from, the coyote is top dog.
The idea that deer populations are suffering from any form of natural predator is preposterous. This kind of logic has been refuted over and over by real world situations. Study what happened on the Kaibab plateau when it was subjected to "predator control." Predators make for healthy prey and healthy ecosystems. There are more deer in Utah now than there ever has been. We should not try to encourage more just so there will be more for us to shoot. To do so is irresponsible wildlife management. Too many deer means too many weak, sick deer. Keep the predators and prey in balance. Keep the deer healthy. You might not get to shoot as many, but the ones you get will be that much more of a prize.
MY T PIMP
12-17-2010, 02:53 PM
My source comes from the Divison RAC meeting I attended on NOV-9 for the Northern Region. Mule Deer happened to be the main topic. I formed my post based on the various biologist and speakers.
There is a saying about coyotes; "when the world ends and the last human has died, there will be a coyote chewing on the body"
There's a new signature for the good Reverend:nod:
ilanimaka
12-17-2010, 05:40 PM
Traps are just another coward's tool used by the small penis crowd. If you want to kill something, go shoot or stab it like a real man. Poisons and traps are for the weak.
Although I would REALLY like to respond to this, I'd prefer to keep this "discussion" out of the Rubbish Bin. but congrats on being the first to resort to name calling. Big man on campus, huh...
It has been proven that coyote populations INCREASE under heavy "predator control." Coyote litters increase in number of pups when they are being hunted. 100 years of coyote "control" measures have resulted in an explosion in coyote population. They are nature's great adaptor.
So when things get harder for them they adapt by having more pups per litter... Huh... I would REALLY like to see your documentation on that little tidbit.
Coyotes are expanding in range and number because they are filling the ecological niche that was once held by the wolf. As wolves were eradicated across the landscape, the coyote moved in. This is why you see coyotes in places that they never lived historically, like downtown New York and Boston. I'm not suggesting that we all live next door to wolf packs, just that the abundance of coyotes has been created and abetted by human practices. In Yellowstone, since the re-introduction of the wolf in 1995, coyote numbers have collapsed. They are once again 2nd dog instead of top dog. In any ecosystem that the wolf has been extirpated from, the coyote is top dog.
AHA! Now THERE'S some facts I've actually seen documents on. Wolves kill yotes, so yote numbers go down (wolves are also MUCH better hunters than we are). Yotes kill fox so their numbers are down. But wait! If the wolves are hunting the yotes, then why aren't their litters increasing to compensate for it? Hmmm... This boat doth leak, methinks...
You might not get to shoot as many, but the ones you get will be that much more of a prize.
Really couldn't give a rats patute for antlers. I'm in it for the meat. :eat:
REDFOX
12-17-2010, 08:01 PM
I have spoke with and hunted with a few lion hunter guides that focus their business mostly in Utah for the past 20 years. They all have said that an adult mountain lion will kill an average of 1 deer per a week. They mostly kill large solitary bucks. They are easier to stalk while they are alone. While it has been said already, there are many factors that can cause a decline in herd quality and quantity, It is my opinion that if trophy bucks are dyeing from predation or old age, this will have an impact on the growth and quality of herds everywhere. I think that this is a complicated matter with no easy quick fixes.
canyoncaver
12-19-2010, 09:56 AM
Although I would REALLY like to respond to this, I'd prefer to keep this "discussion" out of the Rubbish Bin. but congrats on being the first to resort to name calling. Big man on campus, huh...
Sorry, I wasn't necessarily calling you a name, just providing my general perspective on those with the "deer are for us," "predators are bad," mindset. Anyone who thinks it is okay to let an animal suffer in a leg trap for 7 days deserves a bit of a smackdown. In other people's words it is in fact "trashy," and "F-ed up." I don't know you, but if you fall into these categories, then so be it.
So when things get harder for them they adapt by having more pups per litter... Huh... I would REALLY like to see your documentation on that little tidbit.
I looked it up, but it would be better if you did the research for yourself. Just google "compensatory reproduction / coyotes." Then you will see the wealth of papers, articles, and informational brochures from all over the U.S. and Canada that describe this phenomenon in coyotes and many other animals.
AHA! Now THERE'S some facts I've actually seen documents on. Wolves kill yotes, so yote numbers go down (wolves are also MUCH better hunters than we are). Yotes kill fox so their numbers are down. But wait! If the wolves are hunting the yotes, then why aren't their litters increasing to compensate for it? Hmmm... This boat doth leak, methinks...
Here's the difference. Wolves kill the coyotes they can catch. This includes especially coyote pups in a den. Human coyote control focuses on adult animals. So in our case, the compensatory litter of 15 pups has already grown up and we have to find and kill all of them. Hence, an overall decrease due to wolf predation, and an overall increase due to human predation.
Really couldn't give a rats patute for antlers. I'm in it for the meat. :eat:
Sorry if the word "prize" confused you into thinking I was only talking about trophy hunts. That's not what I meant. I should have used a different word. In a healthy deer herd, the meat will also be more of a prize. It will be healthier, not as stressed by shortage of food, and there will be more meat per animal. Healthy herds translate into better meat and antlers.
canyoncaver
01-05-2011, 07:15 AM
Here's the decision for now anyway....
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=13884663
ilanimaka
01-05-2011, 11:20 AM
I'm glad they shot down this change. As much as I dislike coyotes, I wouldn't want to see any suffer. Mother Nature is a b!tch as it is.
On a side note, the comment by Bob Bristler about re-intorducing wolves to Utah is the epitomy of stupid. Sure, let's decimate the coyote population by bringing in wolves, even though wolves are FAR more proficient hunters & would cause more damage to the local deer/elk herds in a year than the coyotes could in several.
What a moron... :roll:
Sombeech
01-06-2011, 09:17 AM
13884663
Rev. Coyote
01-06-2011, 10:44 AM
MY T PIMP -- That's a good one!!
Rev. Coyote
01-06-2011, 10:49 AM
Beech -- In that video, I'd say the best point goes to the inadvertent trapping of unintended quarry. Some of us run dogs (more of a southern thing I guess, but I know of one guy running redbones in Utah), and would hate to see a good dog crippled or killed by someone's trap. (If it were my dog, I'd wait for the trapper to come around...just sayin.)
LB_Design
01-31-2011, 11:54 AM
i done alot of trapping growing up, mostly snaring. Good times and good way to get out there in the winter months.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.