PDA

View Full Version : Vail ice climber survives 72-foot fall



Iceaxe
03-30-2009, 05:41 PM
Vail ice climber survives 72-foot fallBy Edward Stoner
The Vail Daily


VAIL — Chris Boratenski was suspended 72 feet above the ground when he felt a pop. A second later, he felt another pop.

Then he went into a freefall.

He watched the rope that was supposed to be supporting him coil like a snake at his side as he fell.

"The only thing that went through my mind was envisioning my wife and my son, who just turned a year old two days ago," Boratenski said last week. "I just said, 'I'm sorry. I'm sorry that I wasn't going to be there for him.'"

Boratenski, 31, of Evergreen, and two friends were climbing the Designator, a massive, vertical ice formation that hugs a cliff near East Vail, on March 21.

As Boratenski will readily admit, his own mistake caused the accident.

He was the first one up that morning, using a technique called "lead climbing" to ascend the ice. At the top, he prepared a rope for a different technique called "top-roping," in which a rope runs from a person at the bottom, through an anchor at the top, and then back down to the climber.

At the top, Boratenski found nylon cords as well as a metal carabiner. He used the nylon instead of the metal as an anchor, something he now knows was a terrible mistake.

"It was a major oversight on my part in that friction caused when rappelling off the top rope is going to burn through those anchors," Boratenski said.

His two friends both used the rig to climb up and down the Designator. By the time it was Boratenski's turn again, the nylon was primed to snap. Which is exactly what happened.

He doesn't remember the impact.

Based on photos, he and his partners later calculated that the free-fall was 72 feet to the nearly-flat ground below. His friends told him that he landed on his back and tumbled another 30 feet.

Apparently, he slowly began to regain consciousness about 30 seconds after impact.

It took rescuers 30 minutes to reach him, and two and a half hours to get him down to the ambulance.

Boratenski said he didn't expect to survive the fall. He came away with nine broken vertebrae, a broken rib, a collapsed lung, lacerations to his face and a broken nose. He was released from Vail Valley Medical Center on Wednesday.

Doctors believe he'll make a full recovery, though he'll have to spend eight weeks in a back brace.

"I consider myself extremely lucky," he said. "I'm so thankful that it was me that fell. I can't even fathom if I was the one to set those anchors and (his climbing partners) Oscar or Charlotte ... ," Boratenski said, his voice halting with emotion. "If those guys had been ... ."

Boratenski said he's been ice climbing since 1999 and has done big climbs in Ouray and Banff, Alberta. He's done much more difficult climbs than the one in Vail that almost took his life, he said.

"That very well could have been a big part of the problem, that I was overconfident and too comfortable in my surroundings up there," he said.

He said he plans to ice climb again.

"I can't blame ice climbing for what happened up there," said Boratenski, who works as a mobile technology consultant. "All I can blame is my own lack of oversight in taking the right precautions and doing the right things.

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_12029503

price1869
03-30-2009, 05:49 PM
I'm slightly confused.

He was top-roping through the nylon? WTF? I don't see how anyone who had been climbing for more than a day (or anyone with a tick of common sense) could make that mistake. I must be reading something wrong, or the report was wrong.

Strange.

denaliguide
03-30-2009, 06:02 PM
he obviously wasn't rappeling through the webbing. he must have been getting lowered off. thats the only way friction can be generated. when rappelling the rope shouldn't be moving at the anchor whether its through a biner or not. hard to believe that a climber with allegedly 9 years of experience would do something like this. especially if he was setting up a toprope for someone else to follow up on. WTF!!

Iceaxe
03-30-2009, 06:09 PM
Always someone attempting to win a Darwin Award.

denaliguide
03-30-2009, 06:16 PM
Always someone attempting to win a Darwin Award.

probably will get an honorable mention.

Brian in SLC
03-31-2009, 08:38 AM
Scary. He must have rigged for a rappel off the sling/cord, then, forgot that he'd done that when his buds were TRin' off it.

Crazy.

Remember there was a gal here around ten years ago or so who successfully sued her "experienced" partner for lowering her through webbing on a TR, which, gave way and hurt her pretty bad.

-Brian in SLC

Jaxx
03-31-2009, 10:08 AM
wow that guy is lucky. Even as a noob I know not to use slings instead of a biner. Rope on webbing. Of course its going to cut it. And it says that he found it at the top. Who uses left slings/webbing? That just seems rediculous and he let his two buddies climb on it. I wouldn't climb with this guy. 9 years and he doesn't know not to use rope on slings and he uses climbing gear that he found left behind by someone else?

Brian in SLC
03-31-2009, 10:36 AM
wow that guy is lucky. Even as a noob I know not to use slings instead of a biner. Rope on webbing. Of course its going to cut it. And it says that he found it at the top. Who uses left slings/webbing? That just seems rediculous and he let his two buddies climb on it. I wouldn't climb with this guy. 9 years and he doesn't know not to use rope on slings and he uses climbing gear that he found left behind by someone else?

My bet is 99.9% of climbers use gear left behind by others. Whether is a bolted belay station, or, a sling on a tree, or, a v-thread at the top of a popular ice climb. Commonly done. Not all routes have easy walk offs...

It was a simple, foolish mistake.

Interesting info from his partner, posted on the 'taco, below.

What I take away from this is, double check yourself, and, double check your partner. Two people got TR'd off that set up and didn't notice anything wrong. That's pretty crazy. Easy to be in "client" mode though.

-Brian in SLC

I was standing 15 feet from Cri when he landed...

I don't think it is so much about knowledge or education. As Cri said in the above referenced article, he felt very confident during the climb and made a mistake by leaving out the most important part of the anchor while threading the rope for his initial double rope repell. We all repell off softgoods all the time - may be he didn't think that this would also be a jo-jo anchor... He doesn't know himself. But, if asked before hand if it's ok to use only softgoods for a TR anchor, he very well knew that doesn't work.

Here's my three learnings:
-I could have asked him "Cri, how did you thread the anchor" once he came down on his double rope. That would have prevented the accident since I would have led up an re-done it.
-Both me and my wife Charlotte followed on TR, however neither one of use climbed the last 5 feets up to the anchor and double checked it.
-I used the same anchor when I led the climb the day before the accident (yes, I used the biner). However, I wanted double back-ups so I used a 6mm cord (spectra/nylon) as a second backup. The anchor now had the sling w. the biner, a 1/2" sling as back-up and the 6mm cord. Now to my learning: The 6mm cord burt off in Cri's fall and hence didn't at all work as a backup.

Think about it... do you always check others TR anchors? You do? Good for you. I didn't. Did you know that cords make really back back-up's? Good. I didn't.

You live and you learn.

Peace.

tanya
03-31-2009, 10:50 AM
:eek2: