PDA

View Full Version : Lawyer sues dry cleaner for $65 million for losing his pants


Scott P
05-03-2007, 07:00 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070503/ap_on_fe_st/65_million_dollar_pants
RugerShooter
05-03-2007, 08:04 AM
I can't believe it now Judges are filing frivolous law suites
JP
05-03-2007, 08:10 AM
What pair of pants costs that much. Frivolous is right :roll:
jumar
05-03-2007, 08:17 AM
Those must be some nice pants
hank moon
05-03-2007, 09:39 AM
What pair of pants costs that much. Frivolous is right :roll:

Beyond frivolous - downright abusive. This "judge" is a nut and should be de-judged or whatever it's called - immediately.
marc olivares
05-03-2007, 10:01 AM
Beyond frivolous - downright abusive. This "judge" is a nut and should be de-judged or whatever it's called - immediately.


man i couldnt agree more... talk about bad judgment
epek
05-03-2007, 10:10 AM
These must be the only pants that he ownes that doesn't make him look fat.
nefarious
05-03-2007, 07:49 PM
Every minute they waste on this frivolous lawsuit, they're not able to waste on other frivolous lawsuits.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ApUXmN2Abfk&mode=user&search=
HEADHUNTER
05-03-2007, 08:26 PM
The judge is a prick - the cleaners found the pants and he wouldn't accept their apology or an offer of $1,000.

What is worse - there's another judge that is hearing this case and doesn't have the balls to stand up this moronic judge and tell him to shut the hell up and take the pants and drop the law suit.

Shows you how pathetic the legal system can be.

Sorry Scott P. Card - just had to vent than one out.
Scott Card
05-04-2007, 03:36 PM
The judge is a prick - the cleaners found the pants and he wouldn't accept their apology or an offer of $1,000.

What is worse - there's another judge that is hearing this case and doesn't have the balls to stand up this moronic judge and tell him to shut the hell up and take the pants and drop the law suit.

Shows you how pathetic the legal system can be.

Sorry Scott P. Card - just had to vent than one out.

No apology necessary. From the article, I agree the judge is a punk. He is what gives my profession a bad name. He is violating the cardinal rule "A person who represents himself has a fool for a lawyer". Probably no lawyer would help him. I wonder what the real motivation is for this judge. Is it really that he is a king sized jerk or is he trying to create a frivolous suit to increase pressure for tort reform? I am tempted to say that the Odds are he is a jerk.